On Thursday, 12 June 2014 at 17:35:39 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Naturally, it doesn't yet exist in hap.random because, as Joseph said, hap.random's "step one" is to match the current std.random as closely as possible. I'd be happy to put together a PR to adapt my RNG stuff above to hap.random whenever it would be desired.
Wow! Looks great :) Thanks for all the work on that.
