Rikki Cattermole <alphaglosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 29/12/15 12:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> One more note: I salute the initiative of another doc generator and read >> the motivation behind it. Yet I do think it's worth asking ourselves two >> questions: >> >> (a) is the new proposed system differentiated enough to justify its >> existence and motivate others to join in? > > It supports comments on manifest enums sorta like as if it was named. > The others do not ;) > > So I'm already very wanting of this solution to say the least. >
Is this feature unreasonably difficult to integrate within the existing products?