On 25 Jan 2016 7:16 PM, "Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d-announce" < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 15:47 +0000, jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce > wrote: > > > […] > > > > I'm sympathetic to this. I still just download Anaconda and not > > bother with much else. > > But that is the whole point I am trying to make. Anaconda (or > Miniconda) is not a single massive monolithic library, it is a package > management system for a Python milieu. You have a single command conda > that allows you to get the bits you want. It is just pip on steroids, > but with proper curation. Sadly they are still on Qt4, but… > > The analogy to Miniconda in Python is Dub in D. > > The analogy to Anaconda in Python is downloading the whole of the Dub > repository before doing anything. > > Actually Dub is more like Pip. Continuum Analytics put a lot of effort > into managing their separate repository. Very little crap, lots of good > stuff. But focused on data science. > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >
Reading the whole thread here it seems we're all pretty much in agreement about lightweight phobos + dub on steroids. - phobos should be the common glue allowing interoperability between various libraries and apps. - druntime should be OS abstraction? - dub should be first or second thing you download when using D (depends if it can install d itself) Perhaps: 'dub install dmd' installs dmd 'dub install ldc|gdc' ... 'dub init +gui ' could init a gui app with recommended dependencies. 'dub init +web' for Web dev. Etc... ?
