On Thursday, 9 February 2017 at 17:45:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
No. There should be appropriate checks and reviews, yes. But,
no, every little fix and improvement shouldn't feel like trying
to get somewhere in a year-long tabs vs spaces debate or making
a big-budget sales pitch to Indecisives Anonymous.
Yep! There are currently 165 poor sinners in DMD PR purgatory.
The oldest is going on 5 years, waiting on someone to make a
decision whether to use "-version", "-versions", "-dversion", or
"-version=?". Then, it would have to be rebased, and languish
again for another indeterminate amount of time. I wouldn't be at
all surprised if the original contributor has moved on; I would
have 4 years ago.
Mike
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: two po... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: tw... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- R... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d-announce
- ... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: tw... Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce
- R... Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Questionnaire Mike via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Questionnaire Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Questionnaire Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Questionnaire Dsby via Digitalmars-d-announce
- Re: Questionnaire Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce