On Thu, 2019-08-01 at 14:49 +0000, bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-learn wrote: […] > There's nothing wrong with Haskell if you want to take a deep > dive into pure functional programming. I personally find Haskell > to be more of a religion than a programming language. You can > learn the same perspective from functional-first languages like > Clojure, Scala, Ocaml, and F#. […]
Whilst I agree that most "this is the one true programming language" people are quasi-religious, programming languages are not: Haskell is a just a lazy, pure functional programming language, some adherents show quasi-religious fervour, just as some adherents of C++, Java, C, Go, Rust, D, etc. do. I am not sure about F# (I do not know anything of it), but Clojure, Scala, and OCaml are very different from Haskell for various reasons, cf. lazy vs. eager, pure vs. impure. Haskell is a programming language worth learning for all programmers,along with Lisp, Prolog, and Erlang. I'll bet (but I have no experimental data, just a hypothesis) that any D programmer that knows Haskell writes better D than a D programmer who doesn't know Haskell. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
