On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 11:45:00 UTC, Bo wrote:
* Your guaranteed that this will have maintainers. Unlike alternative unofficial solutions.

This is where you're wrong.

Considering that D is an open-source language, nothing is guaranteed.

Neither is there any guarantee who works on what and the same people who works on the "unofficial libraries" might as well be the __same__ people who works on the "official libraries"... That is actually the case in many of the __popular__ "unofficial" libraries, that they also contribute to D itself.

* Guaranteed for a official stable API that will be similar across libraries. Cutting down on time for new developers to get familiar with the language.

I partially agree with this, but again history shows that D's official API sometimes isn't as reliable as other unofficial equivalents. There's just a lot of restrictions in how the API is designed in ex. Phobos, which is why new modules sometimes just gets frozen for an unknown time and/or gets completely abandoned.

That same issue can be said about some unofficial libraries, but in those cases it's usually just because they don't gather the attention they deserve and that is where I agree with your point.

Perhaps just adding unofficial libraries as official libraries would be the best solution.

* Having a load of different Independent libraries that "do the same but not exactly the same" is simply bad practice.

Case and point: https://code.dlang.org/search?q=mysql

No official library, some are not supported, some are duplicates with minor changes, no official API or standard... can go on a long time.

My point above stands here too.

Reply via email to