Hi, Karl Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's ok. My idea of having DFBCafe included in DirectFB was to ensure > that the widget toolkit was STANDARD. Just to prevent what has happened > with KDE, Gnome, TK, Mozilla, etc. what exactly is bad about having a variety of toolkits? The only thing that's annoying is if they interact badly. Lately the KDE and GNOME people put a lot of effort into improving the interoperability of their applications. If you are interested you should probably have a look at http://www.freedesktop.org/. There are a couple of toolkit-independent proposals and specs there that should definitely be considered for whatever new application framework you are designing. > If only you could make everything sound that easy, but keep up the good > work. Would the master application be like XDM? or more like a library? > To make it like XDM in the sense of it being a gui login shell would be > cool (and maybe even use DFBCafe). What about in the sense of accecpting > remote connections (or forwarding them)? I'd say that for security reasons the master application should be as simple as possible and should thus probably do nothing but being the master application. Salut, Sven -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
