What part of "This is an open source project, that has no backing, funding,
or otherwise any form of external management or motivation" do you not
understand?

I did not say the previous letter to be smug, or otherwise superior. I am
stating it as very finely reduced ipso facto. If you know that:

(1) the developers of GNUstep develop this on their own spare time, and
have been doing so, for over 20 years at this point
(2) that the developers are focusing their efforts on what they can most
effectively budget their time within
(3) that the developers are in addition to budgeting time, are budgeting
their focus on what they feel (subjective) is a well defined effort (the
APIs, which have known documentation, and can thus be targeted reasonably
well, other factors not withstanding.)

Then, why are you bitching and whining? Listen to me very closely now,
because you seem to miss the huge massive point in all of this:

"Yes, the GNUstep developers have heard your plea, and the pleas of many
others, over many years. They understand your plight. They do listen.
However, given what resources that are had, it is best felt to concentrate
GNUstep to implementing the APIs."

Other developers have taken on trying to build a full environment, e.g.
Etoile. But even they have lives.

So my original statement still stands, your bitching and whining sounds
like the petulant cries of a small boy having a tantrum. You will not
contribute to this project; make it any better for those who might use it.
If you were interested in doing so, your attitude would be diametrically
opposed to the one you are projecting, now.

So please, reconsider what i've said, in the most pragmatic sense: You have
a few choices:

(1) con someone else into making what you want.
(2) wait for someone else to make what you want.
(3) make what you want.
(4) go somewhere else.

I will not comment on this matter further, as my views have been made
plain, and any further argument would be counterproductive.

-Thom


On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Liam Proven <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 10 February 2014 16:55, Thom Cherryhomes <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Why don't you actually roll up your sleeves, and try to build it?
>
> You can keep your patronising, smug and superior "there is no argument
> here". Yes, there *is* argument here. If I want to buy a house, or a
> car, or a hi-fi, I am perfectly within my rights to criticise the
> design of existing houses, cars or hifis; I do not need to be able to
> build one myself to point out the flaws in existing units.
>
> I am a technical writer and journalist, with a sideline in
> consultancy. I test and evaluate computer systems, especially
> software, and write about my discoveries for others to read.
>
> I have tried to install and built GNUstep environments more times than
> I can remember now. I have built them out of Ubuntu packages from the
> Ubuntu  repositories. GS ignores this, but that is how people try out
> Linux desktops in the real world. The result is appalling, barely
> works and crashes every few minutes. It works like an alpha version
> assembled by a couple of amateurs or students in their spare time in a
> few months, not the end result of decades of work.
>
> I came here to talk about this. I was told I was doing it all wrong
> and that those packages were out of date.
>
> So, I tried again using Philippe Roussel's packages.
>
> I had to throw away my test build and start over 4 times before I got
> it working, using Saucy, Raring, Quantal and finally Precise.
>
> It works a little better, but core functionality is still missing.
>
> And now, in the usual condescending fashion of developers everywhere,
> you tell us that if we don't like it to fix it ourselves.
>
> Well, no, that is not how it works. I am not a programmer; I have not
> programmed since the 1980s and do not wish to relearn now.
>
> What I am, though, is someone who evaluates and judges and compares
> OSes, desktops and Linux packages for a living.
>
> When I say GNUstep is badly lacking, a useful response is not "well go
> fix it then", it is, "oh dear, tell us more, what needs fixing?"
>
>
> --
> Liam Proven * Profile: http://lproven.livejournal.com/profile
> Email: [email protected] * GMail/G+/Twitter/Flickr/Facebook: lproven
> MSN: [email protected] * Skype/AIM/Yahoo/LinkedIn: liamproven
> Tel: +44 20-8685-0498 * Cell: +44 7939-087884
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnustep mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep

Reply via email to