I agree with Rich on this one. Brian O'Donnell Doctor PC www.doctorpc.ca
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:35 PM Subject: RE: RSP information in whois > >>> We can move it anywhere, likely below technical I suppose (seems to be > the > general consensus)<<< > > Well, I'm not sure there is any concensus. :) I believe everyone wants it in > a different place. However, for the record, I believe the reseller > information should be distinct from the domain/contact information. It > should be placed either: > > (1) Immediately above the domain record, right after the registrar line (my > preference) > > -or- > > (2) Immediately after the domain record, which would mean after the > nameservers. > > Rich Shockney > RS Marketing > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 12:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: RSP information in whois > > > The logic for moving the RSP information was due to the fact that many > registrars (incorrectly) parse the first email address they see for > transfers. With our current setup that means the RSP info is parsed > (whoops). > > We can move it anywhere, likely below technical I suppose (seems to be the > general consensus) > > As for the fields, I can put it this way: > > 1 - optional > 2 or 3 or 4 - any combination, but one MUST be there. > > Charles Daminato > OpenSRS Product Manager > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: November 26, 2001 11:59 AM > > To: Charles Daminato; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: RSP information in whois > > > > > > Charles, perhaps you could explain the logic for the current and proposed > > placement of the reseller information? > > > > Currently the reseller information is munged among the domain contact > > information. The new proposal simply moves the reseller information deeper > > inside the contact information. > > > > The reseller information should be at the TOP just below the > > Tucows info and > > immediately above the registrant information: > > > > Registrar > > Reseller > > Registrant > > ... > > > > The change to "Registration Service Provider" is a good one, since this is > > the legal entity by which resellers are called in our agreement with > > Tucows/OpenSRS. > > > > Fields: > > > > Field 4 is listed as "URL required (one of 2, 3, or 4). This is a little > > confusing. I assume the URL is required so that is neither field 2, or 3. > > > > Also, I interpret fields #2 and #3 to state that one of the fields (#2 or > > #3) must not be completed. They may not both be blank but they may both be > > completed. Is this correct? > > > > Rich Shockney > > RS Marketing > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charles Daminato > > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:29 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RSP information in whois > > > > > > Well, it's a couple of weeks late, but here is a proposal for changes to > > this mechanism. I'd love your feedback (on or off list). > > > > RSP info in WHOIS Improvements > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > - move RSP Whois output to be below Administrative contact, > > above Technical > > and Billing > > - Change wording to say "Registration Service Provider" > > - Fields should be: > > 1. Company name (optional) > > 2. Admin email required OR > > 3. Phone number required OR > > 4. URL required (one of 2, 3, or 4) > > � Ensure URL has http:// at beginning, and no > > invalid characters > > > > Let me know what you think :) > > > > Charles Daminato > > OpenSRS Product Manager > > Tucows Inc. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >
