> The only problem I have with this is we don't tell people in big bold
> letters when they register their domain that they risk losing it if they
> don't answer email sent to their admin email address every five days
> during any time of the year.

One of my next projects will be a 'Registrant Manual' aimed at
educating registrants on these sorts of issues. It'll be a
vanilla flavoured thing that you folks can take, brand, and
distribute happily....

I'd hope to be done something like that by July; feel free, of course, to
draft a nice introductory letter to your new Admin contacts in the meantime.

> I'm actually surprised that more domains aren't hijacked with this
> policy, since it would be fairly easy to target domains with bogus email
> addresses and simply transfer them away. With many domains not actively
> used (held to protect IP or for future use, etc), the act may go
> unnoticed for quite a long time - certainly long enough to resell
> interesting domain names to others...

Right...but there are mechanisms for dealing with this.....but it does
sometimes get messy.

> It just seems like a harsh penalty to me. "Don't answer email when you
> are on vacation and lose your domain." I have an answering machine that
> answers my phone when I'm out. My mail will wait for me to return from
> vacation. If I own a domain name, I risk losing it when I'm on
> vacation...

Right.....I did admit to being harsh on this one. Consider though, that all
your points, while academically sound, were rendered irrelevant a couple of
weeks ago by the handy dandy Domain Locking feature.

> Not all domains are owned by businesses.

Fair.

>Not everyone answers their
> email in a week.

People will evolve :)

Ken.

> It will be a problem someday. I'm surprised it's not a problem already.
> I suspect it's because not a huge population understands the auto-ack
> policy today.



> -Tim
> --
> myOstrich Internet
> http://www.myostrich.net
>

Reply via email to