Consider this a lobby to our supplier!

Still, tho, Paul said it violated ICANN rules, but I can't
find it and I still haven't been pointed to any ICANN
document which says what you are saying.

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@;tucows.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 11:14 PM
> To: Donny Simonton; 'Charles Daminato'; 'Mark Petersen'
> Cc: 'John T. Jarrett'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Changing Admin Info after Refund
>
>
> Donny - I'm not the one that you need to convince
> - the contract is pretty
> clear in stating that at no point does the
> registrar hold any rights to the
> domain name, nor any elements of the domain name
> record. If it hasn't been
> paid for, then the requirements are also very
> clear that the name shouldn't
> exist (and should therefore be deleted). Do you
> lose? Yup - but that just
> means that those that are concerned about it
> should a) be focusing their
> dev. time on implementing registrar_hold and
> registrar_lock implementations
> that deal with the issue and/or b) lobbying their
> supplier for more
> favorable terms.
>
> -rwr
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Donny Simonton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Ross Wm. Rader'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> "'Charles Daminato'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'Mark Petersen'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'John T. Jarrett'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 00:05 Moo!
> Subject: RE: Changing Admin Info after Refund
>
>
> > Ross, if the customer buys a domain for 10
> years and uses a stolen
> > credit card, and I don't find out about it
> until 20 days after the
> > registration.  Since they never paid for the
> registration to begin with
> > in my model which is registrar->customer, I
> paid for the domain the
> > customer did not.  In this case I am the owner,
> and we have talked with
> > "certain people" who agree with us on this one.  In the
> > registrar->reseller->customer model, that's
> something completely
> > different.
> >
> > Donny
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@;tucows.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 9:14 PM
> > > To: Donny Simonton; 'Charles Daminato'; 'Mark
> Petersen'
> > > Cc: 'John T. Jarrett'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Changing Admin Info after Refund
> > >
> > > At point in time does the registrar or the
> reseller have any claim of
> > > "ownership" to the domain name. If it hasn't
> been paid, the "right"
> > thing
> > > to
> > > do is delete it. The registrar has no
> superior claims to a domaim...we
> > are
> > > also just "pass-throughs"...section 3.5 of
> your registrar
> > accreditation
> > > agreement is pretty specific about this.
> Besides, you should know
> > better
> > > than to let other registrars set a bad
> example for you. If this was
> > the
> > > best
> > > way to proceed, then we'd all suck as much as
> Network Solutions - and
> > be
> > > charging $35 a year for the privilege.
> > >
> > > Can't say that I like it much, but the rules
> are there to be played by
> > -
> > > except by those that don't.
> > >
> > > -rwr
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Donny Simonton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "'Charles Daminato'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> "'Mark Petersen'"
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cc: "'John T. Jarrett'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 21:29 Moo!
> > > Subject: RE: Changing Admin Info after Refund
> > >
> > >
> > > > Chuck,
> > > > Don't want to make this any worse, but we
> do the same thing at
> > > > directNIC.  If a customer charges back on
> us, they did not pay for
> > the
> > > > domain, I did.  Not only did I pay the
> registration fees, but I paid
> > the
> > > > chargeback fees.  So we take the domains
> and put them up for sale.
> > If I
> > > > could I would redirect them to some horse
> porn site, but the owners
> > > > wouldn't let me.  :)
> > > >
> > > > So I do understand why register.com and
> godaddy confiscate domains.
> > > >
> > > > Donny
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:owner-discuss-
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Daminato
> > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 7:47 PM
> > > > > To: Mark Petersen
> > > > > Cc: John T. Jarrett; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: Re: Changing Admin Info after Refund
> > > > >
> > > > > Precedence does not make it "right".  I
> don't fully understand the
> > > > > legalities of it (Ross would have to
> explain - Ross?), but I
> > > > > believe Register does not take control of
> the domain (i.e. they
> > > > > don't assume ownership and sell to
> soemone else).  They simply
> > > > > "hold" it, if it's not paid it stays on
> hold until the day it
> > > > > expires (then it goes up for deletion)
> > > > >
> > > > > Charles Daminato
> > > > > TUCOWS Product Manager
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Mark Petersen wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Stand on precedence. Register.Com is
> allowed to seize domains on
> > a
> > > > daily
> > > > > > basis.
> > > > > > The routinely change registrants WHOIS
> information from whatever
> > > > *was*
> > > > > there
> > > > > > to:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >       register.com
> > > > > >       Unpaid Names Department-R
> > > > > >       575 Eighth Avenue
> > > > > >       New York, NY 10018
> > > > > >       US
> > > > > >       Phone: 212-798-9200
> > > > > >       Fax..: 212-594-9876
> > > > > >       Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If they can do it, why shouldn't we be able to?
> > > > > > It's supposed to be a level playing
> field, right?
> > > > > > Good luck,
> > > > > > Mark
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mark Petersen    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Planet Nic    http://www.planet-nic.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "John T. Jarrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:45 PM
> > > > > > Subject: Changing Admin Info after Refund
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Paul over in compliance says it is
> against ICANN reg's for
> > > > > > > me to change admin info after a
> customer refunds on the
> > > > > > > domain name registration:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "I hate to tell you this but you are
> not allowed to change
> > > > > > > the whois information - ICANN rules.
> It appears as though
> > > > > > > you are trying to take away someone
> else's property."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Frankly, I couldn't care less how it
> looks. I've offered the
> > > > > > > refund codes from the merchant
> account holder LinkPoint
> > > > > > > themselves so there's proof behind
> appearances.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can y'all point me to what he's
> talking to? I can't find it
> > > > > > > in the UDRP or the Reg Agreement. I
> don't mind complying
> > > > > > > with written rules if I can find
> them, but I'd rather not
> > > > > > > let this woman steal three domain
> name registrations if I
> > > > > > > don't have to!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to