On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 21:26, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > True. But when a TLD is created for a purpose, that purpose should be > excluded from .ORG. Hence, .NAME removes the need to put personal > domains in .ORG, the existence of .COM means that a business entity > should not be able to register in .NET or .ORG just because its .COM > peer was taken, etc.
Entitled to your opinion, Roger, but fortunately yours is a vast minority view. Regulation should not exist for regulations sake. I'm with Ross on this one, under regulate. I'd prefer if all TLDs were open, and that consumers made the choice what namespace they wanted to be under. I see no compelling reason for TLDs to have enforced charters. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
