fwiw, i really like the idea of cut/copy/paste as a representation of
fc/remix culture, and i think the bg accomplishes that in a creative way.

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Fred Benenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Yeah -- the sad fact is that a lot of the creativity that we in the FC
> movement like to point to as interesting free culture gets created on a Mac.
>
> I'm guilty -- so is every professional digital photographer I know & work
> with. Linux digital photography is not at a place where its usable by
> professionals yet. But for development and coding, there is no other way,
> and I use linux on all my projects that have web hosting.
>
> I'd love to see alternate designs (perhaps we can match them to user agents
> ... :)
>
> F
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Christina Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I totally got the LV reference and liked it a lot for the exact
>> reason that Kevin just mentioned. As someone who partially grew up in China,
>> I associate LVs with this crazy counterfeit market in Shanghai where they
>> make goods that are actually better quality than the real brand stuff for
>> way, way cheaper. Free Fashion ftw.
>>
>> I'm not trying to make anyone do any extra work! And I certainly am not
>> significantly upset about the background. Although I use only Ubuntu, I too
>> am not a purist in that I think it's far more important for good people to
>> run bad software if they are going to use it to make cool stuff. The only
>> reason why Ubuntu is an option for me is because I never do any video/audio
>> editing and I am trying my best not to play any video games. If any of those
>> things became a necessity, I'd probably have to dual-boot at the very least.
>>
>> That said, maybe if I have time tonight (in my cabin with wifi) I'll fire
>> up ol' GIMPy and see what I can't come up with a few alternative designs.
>>
>> Thanks for the discussion, everyone!
>> Christina
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Kevin Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>
>>> My classmate is writing a thesis about counterfeit luxury goods right
>>> now. It is completely fascinating and was definitely on my mind way
>>> back in the spring when we made that image. There's a whole different
>>> set of ethics, standards, practices, and expectations among consumers
>>> of brands like LV, Coach, Chanel, etc.
>>>
>>> I can't locate a link right now but there are large communities of
>>> people who discuss the best fakes on messageboards and listservs,
>>> collaborating on large databases of otherwise disparate information.
>>> For example, they can identify which factories in southeast Asia
>>> produce the closest approximation of a Kate Spade purse or pair of
>>> Gucci shades. I think rocking the fakes purposefully has a curious
>>> rupturing effect on brand stability. On one hand, the brand emerges
>>> more powerful as it multiplies. But on another, the parent corporation
>>> can't simply price undesirable people out of participation so
>>> consumers/fans are able to usurp/guide the future of the brand.
>>>
>>> Definitely a rich topic for any free culture researcher to dig into.
>>>
>>>
>>> The background of this website has proved a surprisingly verdant
>>> conversation piece! :)
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Dean Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > I'm sure this doesn't make it any better (or maybe it does?!), but
>>> > it's a parody of the Luis Vuitton handbag print:
>>> > http://tinyurl.com/5tcm8l
>>> >
>>> > Can we just treat it as one deliciously big chunk of irony? We all
>>> > know the Apple motto should be "What Copy/Paste?"
>>> > http://tinyurl.com/63cr2f
>>> >
>>> > --Dean
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:40 AM, Kevin Driscoll <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> >> I'm not willing to change the background myself only because it seems
>>> >> really low on my conference-prep priority list. I'm open to changing
>>> >> it if someone else does the lion's share of the work and it works with
>>> >> the design we have going. Sorry to be inflexible, there's just a ton
>>> >> to do.
>>> >>
>>> >> Starting another thread re: #2. Another pet peeve of mine.
>>> >>
>>> >> Kevin
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Christina Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>> 1) Fred: Thanks for pulling up that Wikipedia article! Yeah, it would
>>> be
>>> >>> cool to reappropriate the St. John's Cross for our purposes, but I'm
>>> kind of
>>> >>> questioning if this is going to do it. In this context, it is
>>> definitely
>>> >>> going to be read as the Apple command icon, not anything else.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2) Kevin: I feel you on where you're coming from with this. As a
>>> no-time Mac
>>> >>> user and full-time Ubuntu-on-a-PC user, I guess it threw me off
>>> because I'm
>>> >>> so used to my ctrl key. If you had used "ctrl", it probably 1)
>>> wouldn't have
>>> >>> looked as cool and 2) would have been similarly alarming to Mac
>>> users. BUT,
>>> >>> that said...I'm pretty concerned with how successful at "freewashing"
>>> Apple
>>> >>> is as a corporation. Maybe I'm totally off the mark, but my sense is
>>> that
>>> >>> Mac has been promoting its products as hip & cool and, somehow,
>>> ethically
>>> >>> better than Windows. A lot of free software supporters scoff at using
>>> >>> Windows but are totally comfortable running OS X, and that worries me
>>> >>> (because clearly Ubuntu ftw).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> SO: my proposed alternatives:
>>> >>> * Getting rid of the Squiggle and just having C X V tiled? It might
>>> take
>>> >>> people a while to 'get it', but the design might look more coherent
>>> anyway.
>>> >>> * Using the cut/copy/paste icons that I love oh so much at the bottom
>>> of the
>>> >>> page? (Con: Are those too associated with Office or some such thing?
>>> In that
>>> >>> case, I'm more up for liberating those than the St. John's Cross
>>> thing...)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 3) Kevin again: It's true, we're way too uncontrollably hip for our
>>> own
>>> >>> good.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> <3
>>> >>> Christina
>>> >>> (Sorry if this email made no sense, I blame it on altitude & natural
>>> gas
>>> >>> production-related fumes)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Kevin Driscoll <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> As a part-time Mac user and full-time free software supporter, I
>>> made
>>> >>>> that graphic to mean "cut-copy-paste". I thought of the implications
>>> >>>> on using an icon closely associated with Apple but couldn't think of
>>> a
>>> >>>> similar generic one.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> While we can always better promote freedom, I am afraid we're going
>>> to
>>> >>>> have trouble being less hip.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Kevin
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Asheesh Laroia <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>> > On Sun, 7 Sep 2008, Matt Lee wrote:
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> >> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Christina Xu <
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>> >>> Question: Why is the Mac command button thing being used as an
>>> icon?
>>> >>>> >>> Was it purely an aesthetic choice? 'Cause, in case you forget,
>>> Macs
>>> >>>> >>> are
>>> >>>> >>> kiiind of proprietary all over the place.
>>> >>>> >>
>>> >>>> >> What she said.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > It's a bit late, since I'm on the conf08 list too and could have
>>> spoken
>>> >>>> > up
>>> >>>> > there too (mea culpa), but I agree with Matt's and Christina's
>>> feelings
>>> >>>> > here.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > If there's any hope of making the conference less "hip" and
>>> >>>> > Mac-promoting,
>>> >>>> > and instead more clear that it promotes freedom, I'd appreciate
>>> that!
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > -- Asheesh.
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>> > --
>>> >>>> > Conversation enriches the understanding, but solitude is the
>>> school of
>>> >>>> > genius.
>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> > Discuss mailing list
>>> >>>> > [email protected]
>>> >>>> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >>>> >
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> )_)_)_)_)_)_
>>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> >>>> [email protected]
>>> >>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Discuss mailing list
>>> >>> [email protected]
>>> >>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> )_)_)_)_)_)_
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Discuss mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Discuss mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> )_)_)_)_)_)_
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to