On 8 Nov 2007, at 05:11, Eric Scheid wrote: > On 8/11/07 11:08 AM, "Andrei Herasimchuk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> First of all, higher fidelity isn't just "almost always better," it >> *is* always better. That's a key point, imho. > > It isn't better *when* (not *if*) it introduces noise, which is > anything > other than signal. [snip]
Speed is another issue. I can push through more feedback cycles with low-fi. Adrian ________________________________________________________________ *Come to IxDA Interaction08 | Savannah* February 8-10, 2008 in Savannah, GA, USA Register today: http://interaction08.ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
