So, if I was a person who practiced RED, would I get to say so without sounding egotistical? It's not Genius Design, so I wouldn't be implying I'm a genius, but I would still be saying I can design effective solutions without following "the rules", which isn't all that dissimilar. What if I could prove my designs were effective? Would that make it less egotistical?
Incidentally, this whole idea was the subject of Blink (Gladwell). Basically, if you spend enough time informing your gut, then your instincts can be just as effective, if not more effective, than a boatload of time-consuming research. I like the idea of putting a name to this (easier to reference that way), but I'm also somehow sure it will just confuse matters even more. -r- ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
