hmm? I think I'm still a believer in rigorous methods for making up for the unpredictability of "talent" and "judgment".
-- dave ps. I'm not saying that you, Robert, are being anti-methods, the thought was just merely inspired by your comment below. On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Robert Hoekman Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > While it is interest to know about this practice, I'm not so sure I >> see value in knowing about it? or even understanding it. Further b/c >> it seems to exist outside the "norms" of practice (just >> statistically speaking) it doesn't seem to communicate using >> language that can engage the rest of the design community. > > > Are we sure that RED isn't just a fancy term for "talent"? ;) > > Regardless, on any given day, or any given project, a vastly experienced > designer can be wrong a hundred times and an inexperienced designer can be > right a hundred times. Experience matters far less than judgment. > > -r- > -- Dave Malouf http://davemalouf.com/ http://twitter.com/daveixd http://scad.edu/industrialdesign http://ixda.org/ ________________________________________________________________ Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)! To post to this list ....... [email protected] Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
