I completely agree. The conversations that spawned this were all
about methods, perspectives, tools, and how a designer approaches a
problem. RED does not seem to fit in any of those buckets. It is most
certainly an admirable level to aspire to, but I am not sure it does
much for aspiring designers or students.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 11:05 PM, Dave Malouf wrote:
hmm? I think I'm still a believer in rigorous methods for making up
for the
unpredictability of "talent" and "judgment".
________________________________________________________________
Welcome to the Interaction Design Association (IxDA)!
To post to this list ....... [email protected]
Unsubscribe ................ http://www.ixda.org/unsubscribe
List Guidelines ............ http://www.ixda.org/guidelines
List Help .................. http://www.ixda.org/help
