I wonder then, how the sexual harassment policy would fit into the larger mission of LOPSA.
In my mind, I see it as an integral part of supporting our members. With regard to Gene's comments on other entities addressing the role of law enforcement and state entities, yes, they cover that, and our members' employers cover this as well. Where does that put as an organization? We would not be the only professional organization to have such as policy. For example, the National Communication Association provides one for their members: http://www.natcom.org/uploadedFiles/About_NCA/Leadership_and_Governance/Public_Policy_Platform/PDF-PolicyPlatform-A_Code_of_Professional_Ethics_for_%20the_Communication_Scholar_Teacher.pdf (mentions other associations at very bottom who have similar codes) The IEEE has something that's more similar to our code of ethics http://www.ieee.org/portal/pages/iportals/aboutus/ethics/code.html. What would the policy (or subsection in a policy) mean for us? What is the end goal, what are the desired end results if we put more specific language into the code of ethics? Aaron
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
