CO> I'd like to turn that queston around. Why is it that you'd
CO> automatically presume that having an anti-harassment policy means that
CO> there must have been problems in the past?
Policies that prohibit things are often responses to incidents. But, they
can also be responses to pervasive problems, with society or our community
or whatever.
Wouldn't you say, though, that if harassment wasn't a problem at all, we
wouldn't need to spend a lot of time crafting a policy against it?
(It seems to me that what you're saying is more like "harassment is a
problem, even if there haven't been a specific incidents in LOPSA" --
which I think makes a lot of sense -- rather than "harassment isn't a
problem, but we should have a policy against it anyway -- which I think
wouldn't really make sense, but which I think isn't what you're saying.)
-Josh ([email protected])
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
