On Fri, 9 May 2014, Evan Pettrey wrote:

All Martin has done at this point is ask for people to help organize a
virtual chapter. Has anybody at this point stated that there will be this
distinction (one way or the other) that everybody is so up in arms about?

I took his email to mean he was just trying to get something beneficial to
all of us up and running and looking for people who'd be willing to help.
If we'd all invest as much effort in advancing LOPSA as we do griping about
the things those who are actually trying to make a difference do, LOPSA
could be a very different organization.


No good deed goes unpunished I suppose.

the only complaints here are over the magic word "Chapter"

Different situations have different magic words, and in LOPSA, "Chapter" is one of those in that it has a very specific definition and invokes a lot of work. Everyone is supporting Martin's idea of providing resources to people who aren't near a traditional Chapter, but lots of us are leery of use of that word.

David Lang

On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 2:37 PM, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote:

Well, for a local chapter, you have the "hallway track" around the
meetings.

But to have physical meetings, you have to have a place to meet, arranging
a place to meet has a lot of overhead, and requies signatures and monitary
commitments (if only in terms of insurance).

To be able to say who is able to sign what, a Chapter organization is
formed. To protect LOPSA, it also requires knowing that there are enough
people to mitigate these costs and not bog down the national org.

so for normal chapters, there are lots of reasons to ahve a formal
Chapter, Chapter Officers, dues, etc.

This is why the LOPSA by-laws have the specific definition.

For what's being discussed, I'm in agreement that invoking the work
"Chapter" and therefor all the by-laws and other administrivia overhead
that comes with it will produce very little benefit (if any) and will eat
up time that could be better spent providing the service that is being
proposed (which, like other posters is something I would like to see)

David Lang


On Fri, 9 May 2014, Paul Graydon wrote:

 I have to say I'm with dballing here.  If Chapter comes with a whole
bunch of overhead, based on existing lopsa by-laws why bother having this
as a chapter?  What is the tangible benefit?  That's what people aren't
really answering.  You're focussing on what benefit the end product will
have, the actual content which *everyone* so far is in agreement that it
would be great.

What is the advantage of it being a "Chapter"?

Worse still, if the by-laws require this to be handled through the locals
committee, and they'll have to spend time working out how to fit it in to a
framework that wasn't really created with the concept of a virtual chapter
in mind... why do we want the locals committee to have to spend their time
doing that, unless there is an explicit benefit to be gained in having this
exist as a chapter?

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 01:35:04PM -0400, Derek Balling wrote:

   I think I've made it clear I'm not bashing the idea. I *love* the
idea,
   I've said so before a number of times now.
   I'm just saying not to focus on "Chapter" (which, per the LOPSA
by-laws,
   has a very specific definition and set of requirements) and just
focus on
   "The Content".
   D
   On May 9, 2014, at 1:32 PM, john boris <[email protected]> wrote:

     "Chapters", "Hangouts", Meetups, beer bashes, call it whatever you
want.
     Martin is just trying to work within our current structure. We are
in a
     technology that is constantly changing the landscape and the
language.
     So in the onset they are called Virtual Chapters but later they may
be
     called something else. At least he is trying to do something to stay
     with the times and the Technology. Why beat him up or trash the
idea.
     The idea of this is that a "Virtual" Anything is what he is looking
for
     and someone in the group to stand up and say "Yes I will do that"

     On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Derek Balling <[email protected]>
     wrote:

       I feel like I can't stay out of this.
       Why do I need a chapter to schedule hangouts at 7ET, while
Mario[1]
       schedules some hangouts for 7PT? And if Doug Hughes[2] decides
he's
       staying up late tonight, he can "attend" Mario's 7PT session, even
       though he's on the east coast.
       Again - you're talking about something that needs organizers, but
not
       necessarily "chapters".
       D
       [1] I'm not volunteering Mario. :-)
       [2] Nor do I believe Doug Hughes would ever stay up late. He's
like
       the crotchety old man asleep by 8, get off my lawn.
       On May 9, 2014, at 1:21 PM, john boris <[email protected]>
wrote:

         The one advantage I see to having multiple Virtual Chapters is
time
         zones. So an organizer on the West coast decides to hold the
         meetings at 8 PM. That is 11 PM on the East coast. Also with
         Multiple Virtual Chapters there could be multiple "Meetings" and
         people could then flock to the one that is most convenient to
their
         schedule.

         On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Pamela Lynn Howell
         <[email protected]> wrote:

           IMO, what is actually needed is the *organizer* for the
virtual
           chapter, whatever it may be called.
           ---p

           On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Derek Balling
           <[email protected]> wrote:

             On May 9, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Evan Pettrey <
[email protected]>
             wrote:

               I think you're being a bit pedantic here and I'm not sure
it
               is necessary or beneficial to the discussion.

             I completely disagree. To ME, IMHO, going through this
"virtual
             chapter" process is an unnecessary use of the scarce
resource we
             have called "time".
             I think what he's talking about DOING is great. I think
             scheduling regular hangouts, etc., is a great thing for
LOPSA
             members to have and participate in. I think consuming his
time,
             the locals committee's time, etc., creating such a
"chapter",
             however, is completely wasted. It smells of the type of
             "planning to plan" type of stuff that bogs down volunteer
             groups.
             What does he want? Social/technical/learning experiences
with
             other LOPSA members who aren't geographically proximal? So
make
             that happen, set up the schedule for the hangouts, etc., but
             don't get bogged down in all the details of the Locals
policy,
             like figuring who the "chapter members" of record are, who
allow
             the chapter to maintain its charter, etc., etc.   Just
schedule
             and advertise the hangouts and let any member who wants to
be
             involved be involved.
             Every expense of scarce volunteer time should have an
actual net
             beneficial outcome. Spending time on the virtual-chapter
portion
             of this project doesn't do that. (Spending time on the
"meat" of
             this project has plenty of benefits, obviously).
             I've said my piece, at this point.  We're all grown-ups and
can
             make our own life choices. :-)
             D
             _______________________________________________
             Discuss mailing list
             [email protected]
             https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
             This list provided by the League of Professional System
             Administrators
              http://lopsa.org/

           _______________________________________________
           Discuss mailing list
           [email protected]
           https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
           This list provided by the League of Professional System
           Administrators
            http://lopsa.org/

         --
         John J. Boris, Sr.
         Online Services
         www.onlinesvc.com

     --
     John J. Boris, Sr.
     Online Services
     www.onlinesvc.com


 _______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/

 _______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/


_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to