On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 02:12:59PM -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> On 02/12/2016 02:00 PM, Bryan Richter wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm, yeah, maybe co-op/money/website are a lot more interdependent
> > than I was thinking. That makes me wonder — what is the plan for
> > co-op and money? If they are going to impact site development, and
> > be impacted by it, we need a holistic roadmap. I looked around at
> > the Next and Strategy wiki pages and didn't find any mention of a
> > plan. I'm pretty sure there *is* a plan (part of which is drafting
> > bylaws..?).
> > 
> 
> We need the Bylaws first and foremost, and there's work I need to do
> (partly since Jon, who had done some, hasn't been active lately).

I think it would be good to list these tasks, whatever they may be, in
OpenProject.

Regarding the tech roadmap, I have some more questions about the
relationships between co-op requirements and website requirements.
These questions may be rather pedantic, but my hope is to have a
ridiculously clear set of priorities.

> > Will there be requirements put on the website to achieve any of that
> > vision (non-profit, cooperative, both)?
> 
> The website in terms of the projects we support will need to follow the
> legally stated mission.

So: does the website need to follow the mission before incorporation,
or can it follow afterwards as a work-in-progress? If the former, does
that mean we must be funding other projects before we can incorporate?
(I highly doubt it, but like I said, I want the relationships to be
stunningly clear.)

> Otherwise, we will need to have infrastructure one way or the other
> for managing the board meetings and membership contracts etc. i.e.
> the basic operations of running a co-op.
>
> ...
> On the tech infrastructure side, we need to have the systems that
> recognize co-op members in terms of board elections and other voting.

Again: is this infrastructure a hard requirement for our website
before incorporation, or is it something we can fulfill by other
means first?

I am trying to determine what, exactly, the MVP is. If we can be a
co-op without these features in our website, then it would not be
'minimal' to have them.

If we can AVOID having these features until later, that would give a
lot more flexibility to the tech roadmap, and allow us to hit the
milestone of funding ourselves (!!) a lot sooner.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.snowdrift.coop/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to