> Randomthots wrote: > > Now consider that ODF is a much richer format than HTML. And being > > similar to HTML, there is no technical reason (that I see, anyway) that > > the format couldn't be adapted to eventually replace HTML.
HTML is already TOO complex for mail. That's why it's rejected by so many people. Didn't you read what I wrote last day ? Rich mail acceptance requires a simplified SUBSET of HTML/XHTML, not a SUPERSET like ODF. I shudder a the number of cycles needed to filter a mailing list if its default format changes to ODF. -- Nicolas Mailhot
