I was under the apparently misinformed impression that this had been
brought up as a proper proposal. This needs to be rectified posthaste. As
Torrie brought up changes to the way SynHak operates need to be approved by
member and/or board consensus.As Omar correctly brought up any legal
agreement with SynHak needs to be on file to ensure obligations are being
met.

regards,
Andrew L


On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Craig Bergdorf <[email protected]> wrote:

> it wasn't meant like that (didn't think of it like that until you
> mentioned it - thanks), I was just trying to ram home the point that the
> offer was not one made to take advantage of the space in their time of need
> for personal gain, but to help the space as much as possible, and at the
> time most donations took place, it required a lot of goodwill towards and
> belief in the space to continue donating after (imo) being blasted for
> doing so repeatedly.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Torrie Fischer 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> On Monday, March 03, 2014 11:50:03 Craig Bergdorf wrote:
>> > If i may help summarize the mood as I saw it at the time for those in
>> the
>> > back,
>> >
>> > 48 is still very new, with double the space and a seemingly never ending
>> > list of projects: member's money is flying out the doors with no end in
>> > sight, the saying 'give till it hurts, then come back tomorrow' feels
>> like
>> > it should be the motto.  The word from the treasurer is "we're broke -
>> > doubt we can afford heat, give me a receipt and i'll....  (magic?)", and
>> > the calender relentlessly approaches opening day.
>>
>> The original estimation about heat was $900 based on the only information
>> I
>> knew about our MCF rate. It ended up being around $100. I'd be more than
>> happy
>> to sit down with you and show the accounting that shows we aren't broke. I
>> would not be setting lofty goals of the original $1200 membership credit,
>> $50
>> monthly maintenance budget, $150 buildout budget, etc if we were
>> desperately
>> seeking funds.
>>
>> I'm not sure where you've gotten the idea that we are or ever were broke.
>> When
>> I started working on the accounting I (imho) had been very transparent and
>> consistently reiterated that we in fact have a lot more funds than was
>> previously reported with plenty of evidence. I admit that the evidence
>> was a
>> bit murky, but then again, nobody asked me to work with them to
>> understand it.
>>
>> >
>> > A member everyone loves at the moment generously offers to trade some
>> space
>> > for some monthly cash (as if he hasn't donated enough already), and as a
>> > bonus, extra shelves to use as wall dividers until real walls can be
>> > afforded.  Who could possibly be against such a donation at that time?
>>
>> Please don't bring up quantity of contributions as any kind of metric of a
>> person's value. Please just no. That is a very very bad road to go down.
>>
>> >
>> > /end my mood at the time
>> >
>> > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Torrie Fischer
>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> > > On Monday, March 03, 2014 10:13:08 Omar Rassi wrote:
>> > > > My understanding from conversations at the space about this was
>> that the
>> > > > racks would have plywood walls built onto them so that they can be
>> > > > separated from prying eyes and sticky hands. Nothing on those
>> shelves
>> > > > should concern anyone but the Lessee and legal agents of the
>> lessor. Is
>> > > > there a copy of the lease on the documents repo or filed on paper at
>> > > > Synhak??? I feel as Champion I should at least be familiar with the
>> > >
>> > > details
>> > >
>> > > > of the lease in order to help protect everyone's interests.
>> > >
>> > > No, there is nothing. Some time ago there was a copy sent to bizops@,
>> but:
>> > >
>> > > * There was no board vote
>> > > * There was no proposal
>> > > * I've never seen a signed copy
>> > > * I raised issues with the version sent to bizops@ that were totally
>> > > ignored
>> > >
>> > > Citations:
>> > >
>> > > Original question:
>> > >   https://synhak.org/pipermail/bizops/2014-January/000053.html
>> > >
>> > > Devin posted the lease to bizops@:
>> > >   https://synhak.org/pipermail/bizops/2014-February/000066.html
>> > >
>> > > Raising issues:
>> > >   https://synhak.org/pipermail/bizops/2014-February/000068.html
>> > >
>> > > No, there was no vote or proposal:
>> > >   https://synhak.org/pipermail/discuss/2014-February/003270.html
>> > >
>> > > I am unable to find any mention of a sub-lease in meeting minutes
>> prior to
>> > > the
>> > > above mails.
>> > >
>> > > If the lease was signed without any formal discussion or approval, I
>> would
>> > > feel that it is a massive breach of trust and possibly not even
>> legally
>> > > binding.
>> > >
>> > > > On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Torrie Fischer
>> > >
>> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
>> > > > > I am not comfortable with those racks that a board member is (in
>> > >
>> > > theory)
>> > >
>> > > > > leasing space for.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > At today's open house, I saw numerous guests grabbing and poking
>> > >
>> > > things. I
>> > >
>> > > > > then put up signs and kept an eye on it. Didn't help. I've also
>> > > > > noticed
>> > > > > that a few synhak things are on the racks now.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If synhak is somehow liable for those racks, I have some questions
>> > > > > that
>> > > > > will be brought up on Tuesday:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > When did the board approve such a situation or lease?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Where was the membership discussion about the use of space that
>> does
>> > >
>> > > not
>> > >
>> > > > > contribute to hacking?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Is synhak liable for any damages or stolen equipment? What if
>> some of
>> > >
>> > > our
>> > >
>> > > > > stuff ends up there?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If synhak is liable, does that mean the champions are required to
>> > >
>> > > police
>> > >
>> > > > > the racks? You'll never get members to do that.
>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > > Discuss mailing list
>> > > > > [email protected]
>> > > > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Discuss mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://synhak.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to