On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:05:08 +0100 "Paolo Gentili" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> your thoughts or experiences about how much trust can i have on pfsense Since everyone is just singing praises, I'll add some things to look for ;) Besides running it at home we run it on three production locations, which are two server rooms and one fast growing wireless lan. First bad expirience: it is really touchy about the quality of your cd burner and blank CDs. This mostly shows as misterious crashes and kernel panics during boot or later during install. It took us some time to figure that out. Second bad expirience: 1.0.1 leaves hw.ata.wc enabled by default (didn't check 1.2), which ended up with one toasted fs after a power failure. Fortunately config.xml was backed up :) Third bad expirience: once it's up it works rock solid, but there is a kernel panic every now and then during boot or during shutdown. Again, this is 1.0.1, haven't looked at 1.2. Despite all this, pfSense is still by far the best thing you can get today. -- Jure Pečar http://jure.pecar.org/
