This reminds me when m$ agreed to sponsor an open source rewrite of one of 
their languages, and asked the devs to reproduce the same bugs that were in the 
closed source version, and then went on and sold that as a feature.

If there are people who are willing to maintain old versions for money that's 
fine, and could certainly be done under a non-profit / charity it's just about 
not keeping any benefit for the organization.

But it certainly goes against everything I would know about CI/CD (I mean as 
practice, not as tools).

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Django developers  (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to django-developers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/django-developers/9SBF1_T9X-zWOFJ0I_cHzJLYuExGvBvsNK5KqU6004_Mvrc8073Z9Pw0NZbnatZeAwm8SWR76s_l52rT__1VGC9GfCVmeE6NAKmZdqZodrk%3D%40protonmail.com.
  • ... אורי
    • ... Carlton Gibson
    • ... Adam Johnson
      • ... אורי
        • ... Kye Russell
        • ... Patryk Zawadzki
          • ... Kye Russell
            • ... '1337 Shadow Hacker' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
              • ... '1337 Shadow Hacker' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
                • ... Josh Smeaton
                • ... Aymeric Augustin
                • ... James Bennett
                • ... Levi Cameron
    • ... '1337 Shadow Hacker' via Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)
    • ... Pkl

Reply via email to