>If I read the code correctly, the original author's address is added to >the Reply-to. MUA support of reply-to is a bit variable, but generally >it is supported.
Anyone who's run mailing lists very long knows that the setting of the reply-to is a long running religious argument. Some people think that it should always, ALWAYS, go to the list, and anything else is a perversion of nature. Some think that it should always, ALWAYS, go to the author, and anything else flies in the face of all that is right and decent. And some think that if there is a Reply-To: in the submitted message, the list should never, NEVER, change it and to do so shows an unspeakable level of ignorance and depravity by the list manager. As Dave suggested, this argument has been going on for decades and is no closer to being settled now than it was 15 years ago. My lists wimp out and make it a per-recipient option. If Franck has invented yet another thing to put in the Reply-To: field, if nothing else he may have come up with something about which all of the aforementioned groups agree. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
