>It's not just DMARC. DKIM has been around for several years now, and >lists still break it.
There's a significant difference: that's neither a bug nor a problem (despite endless efforts by some people to claim otherwise.) The original DKIM signature protects the mail from the original sender to the list. The list's DKIM signature protects the mail from the list to the final recipient. Works great, problem solved. Nobody has ever been able to describe to me a halfway plausible scenario in which the final recipient would need the original signature rather than the list signature to prevent abuse, but this is way afield of the DMARC issues. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
