On 04/10/2014 06:30 PM, Al Iverson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:15 AM, John Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
You have perhaps pointed to a fairly elegant way for MLMs to deal with
p=reject: ...
* Just hitting reply no longer works of course, ...
By breaking perfectly reasonable and useful features for everyone.
Please stop.
Please continue! Trying new things is a first step in evolution of a
process. Sometimes they work out, sometimes they don't. You and we
tend to learn from the experience regardless. Occasionally naysayers
will respond and explain patiently and repeatedly that for the past 35
years, email and lists have worked exactly a certain way and that this
means they should not change. Don't listen to them; "because 1970s"
isn't a valid reason to stand still.
Hmm, maybe it's the problem that you don't listen to what people exactly
try to say. People on this list who are concerned about the recent move
of Yahoo! talk about the status quo of the Internet AD 2014. And that
Internet of 2014 shows a plethora of different mail systems and
implementations, building (of course) on the technology that is present
(and has been developed during the last 30 years). Ignoring that
installed base means that the small number of too-big-to-block ESP's
solve their own problems at the cost of millions of smaller companies.
In Europe Yahoo is only a small player, which makes it easier to put the
penalty for this move where it belongs...
/rolf
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms
(http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
