On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Benny Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > > there is as i see it many that say still SPF when there problem is > Sender-ID :( >
Does anyone still use Sender-ID? I'm told even Microsoft does not. > > does milters need it ?, or is opendmarc use its own braindead api for > needing untrusted fake headers ? > If you have any constructive suggestions for API improvements to opendmarc, please post them to the opendmarc-users mailing list. If you are just looking to spew more anger, try /dev/null. > when will open(SPF|DKIM|DMARC) be a single API, with 3 seperate milter be > made possible ? > All three have libraries you can use to write your own filter that does all three if that's what you'd like. I look forward to seeing your patch. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
