The other authors can comment but to me ILSR and LISP are the same thing. ILSR is an architecture that can use the LISP protocol set.
Dino > On Feb 6, 2018, at 10:03 PM, Bogineni, Kalyani > <kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com> wrote: > > Dino: > > This paper does describe the architecture. This information in a section > would help and also explain what is different between > LISP and ILSR. Figure 3 shows SMF for ILSR, AMF+, Nsmf+, Namf+, and ILSR4. > You can explain what the '+' means and what the > new functionalities in SMF for ILSR are and what ILSR4 is (is it a variant of > N4/Sx - PFCP in 29.244). > > Kalyani > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 9:44 PM > To: Bogineni, Kalyani <kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com> > Cc: Tom Herbert <t...@quantonium.net>; i...@ietf.org; dmm <dmm@ietf.org>; Sri > Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com> > Subject: Re: [Ila] [E] Re: [DMM] Fwd: New Version Notification for > draft-herbert-ila-mobile-00.txt > >> Please look at 3GPP TS 23.501 to understand the architecture of NGC. We >> tried to explain that in the White paper. >> TS 23.502 has the procedures for the NGC. TS 23.503 specifies the policy and >> charging control framework for NGC. >> CT4 has a technical report on protocol aspects for NGC in TR 29.891. >> >> Your draft needs to describe how it fits in the 5G architecture, right now >> it only addresses 4G. > > This whitepaper (attached below) indicates how > draft-farinacci-lisp-mobile-network fits into the 5G architecture. First of > all, do you agree with it? And if so, do you think that information be put in > a new section? > > Dino > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
