On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) < sgund...@cisco.com> wrote:
> > [KB] I will let Sri answer this. > > Nothing specific to MFA draft, but I will make a general comment. > > > If there is consensus to adopt draft-bogineni as a WG document, and if > this work becomes part of the WG charter, I would think the document should > include all IETF proposals under discussion for the given problem statement > on user-pane optimization. > > At this point, its an individual I-D and it is up to the authors on what > to include, or what to exclude. > > Right. I think that 3GPP Study Item related drafts (there is also Homma draft, all ILA, LISP etc ID-Loc drafts and 5G work) are better stay as purpose specific individual drafts. Otherwise including them to dmm charter, a rechartering of such a scale I believe should require a BoF. My three cents :-) Regards, Behcet > Sri > > > From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Bogineni, Kalyani" < > kalyani.bogin...@verizonwireless.com> > Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 3:14 AM > To: Lyle Bertz <lyleb551...@gmail.com>, dmm <dmm@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-m > obile-user-plane-00 > > Will MFA be proposed as an option > draft-gundavelli-dmm-mfa-00 [KB] I will let Sri answer this. > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
