I agree with Sri. However the aim is to have the WG to reference this draft as part of the response back to 3GPP. Different contenders are welcomed to participate and provide analysis and comparsion.
Arashmid From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 7:48 AM To: [email protected] Cc: dmm <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00 Not sure I agree Behcet. Generally, the distributed mobility management charter does cover optimizations in user-plane and control plane. But, for now, lets not discuss if this is in scope for this WG, or not. Lets focus on technical discussions. Sri From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 3:43 AM To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "Bogineni, Kalyani" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Lyle Bertz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00 On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > [KB] I will let Sri answer this. Nothing specific to MFA draft, but I will make a general comment. If there is consensus to adopt draft-bogineni as a WG document, and if this work becomes part of the WG charter, I would think the document should include all IETF proposals under discussion for the given problem statement on user-pane optimization. At this point, its an individual I-D and it is up to the authors on what to include, or what to exclude. Right. I think that 3GPP Study Item related drafts (there is also Homma draft, all ILA, LISP etc ID-Loc drafts and 5G work) are better stay as purpose specific individual drafts. Otherwise including them to dmm charter, a rechartering of such a scale I believe should require a BoF. My three cents :-) Regards, Behcet Sri From: dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of "Bogineni, Kalyani" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 3:14 AM To: Lyle Bertz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, dmm <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-mobile-user-plane-00 Will MFA be proposed as an option draft-gundavelli-dmm-mfa-00 [KB] I will let Sri answer this. _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
