On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Not sure I agree Behcet. Generally, the distributed mobility management
> charter does cover optimizations in user-plane and control plane. But, for
> now, lets not discuss if this is in scope for this WG, or not. Lets focus
> on technical discussions.
>
>
I know it is procedural.
But it keeps coming up.
I was just reacting to your own mail,
you mentioned that all those drafts are individual.
I think it would help dmm people to see the full perspective.

Regards,
Behcet

> Sri
>
>
> From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 3:43 AM
> To: Sri Gundavelli <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Bogineni, Kalyani" <[email protected]>, Lyle
> Bertz <[email protected]>, dmm <[email protected]>
>
> Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-
> mobile-user-plane-00
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> >  [KB] I will let Sri answer this.
>>
>> Nothing specific to MFA draft, but I will make a general comment.
>>
>>
>
>
>> If there is consensus to adopt draft-bogineni as a WG document, and if
>> this work becomes part of the WG charter, I would think the document should
>> include all IETF proposals under discussion for the given problem statement
>> on user-pane optimization.
>>
>
>
>> At this point, its an individual I-D and it is up to the authors on what
>> to include, or what to exclude.
>>
>>
> Right.
>
> I think that 3GPP Study Item related drafts (there is also  Homma draft,
> all ILA, LISP etc ID-Loc drafts and 5G work) are better
> stay as purpose specific individual drafts.
>
> Otherwise including them to dmm charter, a rechartering of such a scale I
> believe should require a BoF.
>
> My three cents :-)
>
> Regards,
> Behcet
>
>> Sri
>>
>>
>> From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of "Bogineni, Kalyani" <
>> [email protected]>
>> Date: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 at 3:14 AM
>> To: Lyle Bertz <[email protected]>, dmm <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [DMM] [E] Re: draft-bogineni-dmm-optimized-m
>> obile-user-plane-00
>>
>> Will MFA be proposed as an option
>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-mfa-00 [KB] I will let Sri answer this.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to