On 26-07-18 16:22, KatolaZ wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 04:13:41PM +0200, info at smallinnovations dot nl > wrote: > > [cut] > > I guess our main problem is to maintain packages that depend on > systemd, and provide alternatives for that dependency. Not to ease the > life of developers that decide to rely on system. Even because I doubt > that such an API would ever be accepted upstream (i.e., by systemd > developers). > > > HND > > KatolaZ
It would help maintaining packages that depend on systemd too. You only would have to add some code to use the libnosystemd instead of libsystemd0. Like if no systemd installed then use libnosystemd. Depending of which API calls are used in the program and which are supported by libnosystemd you would have to do less. And you are not depending on a monolithic binary blob like systemd because you can script any API call the way you like it. Grtz Nick
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
