On Apr 8, 2020, at 9:41 AM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-dprive-dnsoquic/ > > Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption > by DPRIVE, and comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
This draft is better than earlier versions, but still is missing something that seems crucial: detailed comparison between the protocol described here, DoT, and DoH. The suggestion in the text that the comparison would be added after there are implementations seems like the comparison would be about speed, but comparisons about protocol complexity, security, and privacy seem incredibly important as well. The WG might delay adoption until this significant part is added to the document. > Please also indicate if you are willing to contribute text, review, etc. I would be happy to review and etc. after the needed comparisons are added. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
