> On 8 Apr 2020, at 17:55, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > This draft is better than earlier versions, but still is missing something > that seems crucial: detailed comparison between the protocol described here, > DoT, and DoH. The suggestion in the text that the comparison would be added > after there are implementations seems like the comparison would be about > speed, but comparisons about protocol complexity, security, and privacy seem > incredibly important as well.
I think those comparisons belong in a separate document. Which would leave this draft as just the spec for doing DNS over QUIC.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
