On Apr 8, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 8 Apr 2020, at 17:55, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This draft is better than earlier versions, but still is missing something >> that seems crucial: detailed comparison between the protocol described here, >> DoT, and DoH. The suggestion in the text that the comparison would be added >> after there are implementations seems like the comparison would be about >> speed, but comparisons about protocol complexity, security, and privacy seem >> incredibly important as well. > > I think those comparisons belong in a separate document. Which would leave > this draft as just the spec for doing DNS over QUIC.
Would the WG still want to do the protocol work if the eventual comparison was "not noticeably better than DoT or DoH"? --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
