On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:04 AM Jim Reid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8 Apr 2020, at 17:55, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > This draft is better than earlier versions, but still is missing > something that seems crucial: detailed comparison between the protocol > described here, DoT, and DoH. The suggestion in the text that the > comparison would be added after there are implementations seems like the > comparison would be about speed, but comparisons about protocol complexity, > security, and privacy seem incredibly important as well. > > I think those comparisons belong in a separate document. Which would leave > this draft as just the spec for doing DNS over QUIC. >
Yes, however that then begs the question of whether adopting this before the other doc is complete, is a good idea. At a minimum the other doc should be a blocker to publication of this one, but I'd prefer to not adopt this until we have solid consensus around the other (including anything particular that might inform the design/implementation of this one). Brian > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
