--On Friday, July 23, 2010 12:08 AM +0200 Stevan Bajić <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:30:08 -0700 > Quanah Gibson-Mount <qua...@zimbra.com> wrote: > >> --On Thursday, July 22, 2010 6:26 PM +0200 Stevan Bajić >> <ste...@bajic.ch> wrote: >> >> >> I'm not writing off dspam in my environments, but neither am I >> >> rushing to alphatest new versions of a historically unstable, fragile >> >> project. >> >> >> > Alphatest? The release is out since 1/2 year. The alphatest phase is >> > long, long, long ago done. You are in no way alphatesting. 3.9.0 is a >> > stable release. >> >> On a related note, Zimbra upgraded to using DSPAM 3.9.0 quite some time >> ago. During the process (we upgraded to the rc's before the final >> production release), I broke one of the RCs, and heard a multitude of >> complaints. We've had zero complaints with the production 3.9.0 in >> place. So I would think if there was something seriously wrong with the >> release, we'd have heard something by now. ;) >> > Thanks for the feedback. But I am pretty much confident that the user > "Disconnect" does still not care and will not upgrade. > > Anyway... it's good to hear that you have no big issues with DSPAM in > Zimbra. One thing that I find rather strange is that you use DSPAM inside > Amavis in Zimbra. Why is that? Why are you not using DSPAM outisde of > Amavis on a per user basis rather then using one single user (I mean the > way how Amavis is using DSAPM is that it processes messages under one > single DSPAM user account)? Hi Stevan, The DSPAM setup predates my employment with Zimbra, but I've filed a bug to track/review your questions/suggestions. By default DSPAM is disabled on installation, so enabling it is a very specific things that end-admins do. Certainly, improving how it is used is a good goal. --Quanah > You could get much more out of DSPAM if you would wire DSPAM into Postfix > and then from there instruct DSPAM to work with the Zimbra directory and > offer the final user to have his own token data and settings. You off > course could allow administrators to create DSPAM groups which will help > to lower the amount of training/re-training for the final user and will > help to increase accuracy. > > If I would ask you what you would change/add in future DSPAM releases > then what would you tell me? > > >> --Quanah >> > -- > Kind Regards from Switzerland, > > Stevan Bajić -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first _______________________________________________ Dspam-user mailing list Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user
