Hi, It is funny that when it is their work that is being stolen, people's opinion change.
73s Trev (G7PVS) On Sunday 22 February 2009 21:48:54 Peter Loveall wrote: > --- In [email protected], Jack Hamilton <kd6...@...> wrote: > > but your original email did not make it clear why whatever the > > activity is should be considered "abuse", as opposed to merely being > > something that you dislike. > > Any use of IFrames without the prior consent of the web site owner is, > IMO, abuse. It is also the opinion of most hosting companies. Yes, > the pages are copyrightable. I never claimed that the information was > copyrighted, only the pages and use of them in any form on another web > site is a violation of the copyright. > > It amazes me how many people in this day and age believe it is > their "right" to use another person's work without prior consent and > how many people such as yourself are so quick to defend such > irresponsible behavior. > > 73, > > Pete Loveall AE5PL > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Please TRIM your replies or set your email program not to include the > original message in reply unless needed for clarity. ThanksYahoo! Groups > Links > > >
