LOL.
Well, with poor ground conductivity, they become worm cookers. ;)
Dave AB7E
On 7/19/2015 9:59 PM, Phil Wheeler wrote:
Dave,
Re "It's not going to radiate any lower than the horizon..." -- I'd
swear, based on on-the-air results, that I've had a few antennas which
achieved that dubious distinction :-)
73, Phil W7OX
On 7/19/15 9:52 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
It's not going to radiate any lower than the horizon, and that kind
of low angle is extremely useful for long distances. That can be
appropriate even for QRP, although it might be more propagation
dependent versus making some high angle short skip contacts. If I
want to see how far I can work when backpacking, I'm going with a
vertical unless the ground conductivity is just plain awful.
Dave AB7E
On 7/19/2015 5:07 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
KT5X believes [and I don't disagree] that vertical ground planes on
mountain tops tend to radiate downhill which isn't real useful. If
you're above the timberline, you're probably on a mountain.
73,
Fred K6DGW
- Northern California Contest Club
- CU in the 50th Running of the Cal QSO Party 3-4 Oct 2015
- www.cqp.org
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to xda...@cis-broadband.com
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com