election-methods-electorama.com  

Messages by Thread

• • RE: [EM] Re: Condorcet package Paul Kislanko
  • [EM] Re: Condorcet package Ted Stern
  • [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Re: Condorcet package-wvx Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Markus' request Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Markus' request Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Re: Markus' request Ted Stern
  • Re: [EM] Markus' request Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Re: Markus' request Ted Stern
• [EM] Who defined the Smith set MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Who defined the Smith set James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Who defined the Smith set Steve Eppley
• [EM] Re: sprucing up Forest Simmons
• [EM] more on lotteries Forest Simmons
• [EM] Wording of March strategy definition MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Two strategy definitions from March ´04 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Definitions? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Definitions? James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Definitions? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Definitions? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Definitions? James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution Steven Barney
  • Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution Curt Siffert
  • [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution matt
  • Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution Steven Barney
  • RE: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Theoretical Gerrymandering Solution matt
• [EM] Re: Black box election method tests--Is it possible? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Comments on Approval strategy posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Paul reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Black box election method tests - is it possible? Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Candidate withdrawal option Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Black box election method tests - is it possible? Jim & Mary Ronback
• [EM] Paul reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Paul reply Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Cardinal Pairwise MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Cardinal Pairwise James Green-Armytage
• [EM] cardinal pairwise (previously written messages) James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies. Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Threat/Promise Approval strategy. Summary of strategies. Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option Russ Paielli
  • RE: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option Paul Kislanko
  • RE: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] Re: Candidate withdrawal option Steve Eppley
• [EM] candidate withdrawal option and burying James Green-Armytage
• [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Subcycle methods of 1996 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Subcycle methods of 1996 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: How to break this tie? Forest Simmons
• [EM] How to break this tie? Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Nathan Herring
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Markus Schulze
  • [EM] How to break this tie? Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] How to break this tie? Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: A few more poll comments Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: A few more poll comments MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] A few more poll comments MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] A few more poll comments Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: RAMON Forest Simmons
• [EM] Iterative quota voting Jim & Mary Ronback
  • RE: [EM] Iterative quota voting James Gilmour
  • [EM] Iterative quota voting Chris Benham
• [EM] Iterative Ranked Approval Voting Alex Small
• [EM] Misinformation in Approval, 3 candidates MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] "summability" Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] "summability" Daniel Bishop
  • Re: [EM] "summability" Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] "summability" Daniel Bishop
• [EM] A few posting comments MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Vote in Online British Columbia STV Poll !!!! Dgamble997
• [EM] Schulze Condorcet algorithms in Python Russ Paielli
• [EM] RaMON, a method in honour of Ramon Llull Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] Re: lying to pollsters Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: lying to pollsters Eric Gorr
• [EM] Approval equivalent to Condorcet-random :-) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Approval equivalent to Condorcet-random :-) Russ Paielli
• Re: [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle. Gervase Lam
• Re: [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list... Markus Schulze
• [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...) Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] lying to pollsters (was comparative effectiveness ...) Bart Ingles
• [EM] Lottery Methods Forest Simmons
• [EM] Re: Election-methods Digest, Vol 8, Issue 4 William Redpath
• [EM] apology for "no subject" posting Forest Simmons
• [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Comparative Effectiveness of Approval and Condorcet in the case of a three candidate cycle. Russ Paielli
• [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Rob LeGrand
  • [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Forest Simmons
• [EM] reply to Dan Bishop's "Condorcet Failure ..." Forest Simmons
• [EM] (no subject) Forest Simmons
  • [EM] (no subject) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] (no subject) Russ Paielli
  • [EM] (no subject) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Mike: strategy (brief) James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] (no subject) MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] ATLO, defection, MD, method/criterion model Kevin Venzke
• Re: [EM] Clock Methods Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Clock Methods Gervase Lam
  • Re: [EM] Clock Methods Forest Simmons
• [EM] question about open party list PR James Cooper
  • RE: [EM] question about open party list PR jure . toplak
• Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic Markus Schulze
  • Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic Markus Schulze
  • [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list... Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] SCHULZE never used word "fairness" (was Re: MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list... Russ Paielli
• [EM] Standards for credibility on EM (an on-topic post that doesn't name anyone) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] Craig: I did include ballot-counting code Russ Paielli
• [EM] Europe's autonomy solutions [for ethnic groups] Gervase Lam
• [EM] software Dan Keshet
• [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic FL
  • MIKE OSSIPOFF vs The list (Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] I didn't choose to be the topic Dgamble997
• [EM] Ongoing disputes Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Ongoing disputes Eric Gorr
• [EM] Russ's hopefully final reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More comments Re: Can't we all get along? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • RE: [EM] More comments Re: Can't we all get along? Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Re: Can't we all just get along? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Final reply to MIke (don't miss it!) Russ Paielli
• Re: [EM] Mutt-brain SCHULZE; MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation Markus Schulze
• [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election James Green-Armytage
  • Re: [EM] simulating an Approval campaign/election Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: simulating an Approval campaign/election Rob LeGrand
• [EM] Iraq election system James Green-Armytage
  • RE: [EM] Iraq election system James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Iraq election system Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Iraq election system Bart Ingles
• [EM] Flipping a coin MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Peace and Harmony on the List Alex Small
• Re: [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters? Markus Schulze
• [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters? Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] "Approval" name out; VM17 Schulze theory fails; 80k Sincere Votes equals 80k Voters? Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Mutt-brain SCHULZE; MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation Craig Carey
  • Re: [EM] MinMax (Pairwise Opposition) A-wins equation Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Better/Worse strategy with 0-info MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Re: Approval Strategy in the Three Competitive Party case. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Re: Approval Strategy in the Three Competitive Party case. Russ Paielli
• [EM] Better/Worse is simplified Better than Expectation MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Strategy A MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Forest Simmons
  • [EM] Re: Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Bart Ingles
  • Re: [EM] Rewording Strategy A (BF(1st)) Bart Ingles
• [EM] Explicit Voter Median Elections Daniel Bishop
• [EM] Announcement: new election-methods Wiki! Dan Keshet
• [EM] Rewordng strategy A (BF(1st)) MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] More Lottery Methods Forest Simmons
• [EM] Dave reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Condorcet failure of Approval Voting (was Re: Dave reply) Daniel Bishop
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet failure of Approval Voting (was Re: Dave reply) Bart Ingles
• [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting Russ Paielli
  • [EM] Re: Comments on Approval posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] can't we all just get along? James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Re: can't we all just get along? Russ Paielli
• [EM] Amendment and Succesive Cruz VIcente Omar de la
• [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Clock Methods (for Three Candidates) Gervase Lam
• [EM] Comments on Approval posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Approval posting Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Approval posting Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Approval posting Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Comments on Approval posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Comments on Approval posting Russ Paielli
• [EM] Suggestions for choice of Best Frontrunner versions MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves Russ Paielli
  • Re: [EM] How Approval locks onto the CW in two or three moves Forest Simmons
• [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • [EM] typo MIKE OSSIPOFF

• Earlier messages
• Later messages