election-methods-list  

Messages by Thread

• [EM] Any updates on Voting in Med Univ & Relig ORders? Narins, Josh
• [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Wisconsin or Michigan Markus Schulze
• [EM] Joe Weinstein's Approval Strategy Idea Forest Simmons
• [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Sampo Syreeni
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in Wisconsin or Michigan? Forest Simmons
• [EM] The Swiss, Living at the Edge of Democracy Narins, Josh
• [EM] Nanson in the USA Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Nanson in the USA Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Nanson in the USA Narins, Josh
• [EM] 01/21/03 - Re: Wasted votes and quotas: Donald Davison
• [EM] Markus contd. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet definitions MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: Condorcet definitions Alex Small
• [EM] Markus: What is Condorcet's method? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus: What is Condorcet's method? Alex Small
• [EM] Steph: Extremist shouldn't change outcome? MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Steph: Extremist shouldn't change outcome? Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] Markus: Copeland isn't Condorcet MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Markus: Copeland isn't Condorcet Markus Schulze
• [EM] 01/18/03 - Markus on Parties and Candidates in any mix: Donald Davison
  • Re: [EM] 01/18/03 - Markus on Parties and Candidates in any mix: Markus Schulze
• [EM] Steph--median & your criterion MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Condorcet's Words Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words, Part I Stephane Rouillon
  • [EM] Condorcet's Words Part II Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet's Words Stephane Rouillon
• [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: Donald Davison
  • RE: [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] 01/17/03 - No Problem, Olli: Olli Salmi
• Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet--Correction Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet--Correction Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Forest Simmons
• [EM] RP & CSSD pick A,B,C,& D MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] RP & CSSD pick A,B,C,& D Markus Schulze
• [EM] Symmetry and Condorcet Alex Small
• [EM] 01/16/03 - Hey James, Droop Quota is an Oxymoron: Donald Davison
• [EM] Equally stongest unconsidered defeats in RP MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. Stephane Rouillon
  • RE: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. Arnie Urken
  • RE: [EM] Steph: You still haven't heard my question. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Alex Small
  • Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Forest Simmons
  • Re: [ESD] Single-seat cumulative voting options Forest Simmons
• [EM] 01/15/03 - James' reply to my `Northern Ireland Assembly' Letter: Donald Davison
• [EM] The RP example, winnner doesn't beat anyone. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] The RP example, winnner doesn't beat anyone. Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • [EM] On good terms AVnow
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • RE: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Steve Barney
  • Re: [EM] Saari's Basic Argument Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
  • [EM] A practical matter for Ranked-Pairs, among other methods Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Markus Schulze
  • [EM] My site ericgorr
• [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] 1-person-1-vote has been abandoned. Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Adam Tarr
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] 1-Person-1-Vote has been abandoned. Narins, Josh
• [EM] Steph's Condorcet example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] surprising consequence of strong FBC Alex Small
• [EM] Voting site updated Eric Gorr
  • RE: [EM] Voting site updated Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Voting site updated Eric Gorr
• [EM] 01/12/03 - James Gilmour Writes and Writes Somemore: Donald E Davison
  • RE: [EM] 01/12/03 - James Gilmour Writes and Writes Somemore: James Gilmour
• Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Is no Clones rule but EMers that it was used? Markus Schulze
• Re: [EM] Markus Schulze Wrote and Wrote Again: Markus Schulze
• Re: Markus Schulze Wrote and Wrote Again: Donald Davison
• [EM] National Journal article on election reform Douglas Greene
• Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. (fwd) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. (fwd) Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue space Forest Simmons
• Re: Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issue spaces. stephane . rouillon
  • Re: Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issuespaces. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensional issue spaces Eric Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] The voter median candidate generalized to multidimensionalissue spaces. Forest Simmons
• Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Markus Schulze
• [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
  • [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
  • Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting stephane . rouillon
  • Re: Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting ericgorr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] An odd case for Ranked-Pairs Eric Gorr
  • [EM] Tie-breaking for Ranked-Pairs and other methods Stephane Rouillon
  • Re: [EM] Tie-breaking for Ranked-Pairs and other methods Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Condorcet Voting Markus Schulze
  • [EM] Ties (was Condorcet Voting) Alex Small
• Computing Results (RE: [EM] Advanced Math question) Narins, Josh
  • Re: Computing Results (RE: [EM] Advanced Math question) Bart Ingles
• [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: Donald Davison
  • RE: [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] 01/05/03 - Two Replies for Olli: Olli Salmi
• [EM] The new method and the example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Alex Small
  • [EM] Condorcet example(s)? Cory Levenberg
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Dave: Primaries, runoffs Dave Ketchum
• [EM] 01/05/03 - Olli Salmi and d'Hondt: Donald Davison
• [EM] RP elects A & B in Forrest's example MIKE OSSIPOFF
• [EM] Approval from rankings Forest Simmons
• [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Final Conclusion on strong FBC!!!!!! Alex Small
• [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings MIKE OSSIPOFF
  • Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] Approval with 2 ballotings Forest Simmons
• [EM] Elections Results theory Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Elections Results theory Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] Elections Results theory Narins, Josh
• [EM] Advanced Math question Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Forest Simmons
  • Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Forest Simmons
  • RE: [EM] Advanced Math question Narins, Josh
  • Re: [EM] Advanced Math question Bart Ingles
  • RE: [EM] Advanced Math question Narins, Josh
• [EM] 12/30/02 - Alex, Irving still holds the Trump Card: Donald E Davison
  • Re: [EM] 12/30/02 - Alex, Irving still holds the Trump Card: Alex Small
  • Re: [EM] 12/30/02 - Alex, Irving still holds the Trump Card: Adam H Tarr
  • RE: [EM] 12/30/02 - Alex, Irving still holds the Trump Card: Narins, Josh
  • RE: [EM] 12/30/02 - Alex, Irving still holds the Trump Card: Alex Small

• Earlier messages
• Later messages