election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) James Gilmour
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Competitive Districting Rule (back on topic) Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 [EM] Competitive Districting Rule - SPPA Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 [EM] STV and STV-PR Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Chris Benham
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Chris Benham
• 2006/10/15 [EM] Condorcet + IRV completion? Andrew Myers
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] a feasible and powerful approximation to proxy democracy Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/15 [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/15 [EM] a feasible and powerful approximation to proxy democracy James Green-Armytage
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/15 Re: [EM] Question about Condorcet methods Juho
• 2006/10/14 Re: [EM] Question about Condorcet methods Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/14 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/14 Re: [EM] Question about Condorcet methods mrouse1
• 2006/10/14 [EM] Question about Condorcet methods mrouse1
• 2006/10/14 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/13 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/13 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/13 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/13 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/13 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/10 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections David Cary
• 2006/10/10 [EM] Announcing OpenSTV 1.0 (formerly pSTV) Jeffrey O'Neill
• 2006/10/09 Re: [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system raphfrk
• 2006/10/08 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/08 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Ka-Ping Yee
• 2006/10/08 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/06 [EM] My "bible meeting" attack on Rivest, saga continues... Warren Smith
• 2006/10/06 Re: [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system BABA NAM KEVALAM
• 2006/10/06 Re: [EM] nasty new attack on Rivest 3ballot & similar schemes Juho
• 2006/10/06 Re: [EM] nasty new attack on Rivest 3ballot & similar schemes Ka-Ping Yee
• 2006/10/06 Re: [EM] nasty new attack on Rivest 3ballot & similar schemes mrouse1
• 2006/10/06 [EM] nasty new attack on Rivest 3ballot & similar schemes Warren Smith
• 2006/10/06 [EM] Separation of Powers taken to the extreme raphfrk
• 2006/10/06 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections David Cary
• 2006/10/04 [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system raphfrk
• 2006/10/04 [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system Subscribed Lists
• 2006/10/04 Re: [EM] 3ballot - simplification for range raphfrk
• 2006/10/04 Re: [EM] fix to Rivest 3-ballot flaw! very simple raphfrk
• 2006/10/03 [EM] fix to Rivest 3-ballot flaw! very simple Warren Smith
• 2006/10/03 Re: [EM] 3Ballot -- Condorcet version # (or is it #3?) by Mrouse Juho
• 2006/10/03 Re: [EM] 3Ballot -- Condorcet version # (or is it #3?) by Mrouse mrouse1
• 2006/10/03 Re: [EM] 3ballot / rouse idea Juho
• 2006/10/03 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/10/03 [EM] 3Ballot -- Condorcet version # (or is it #3?) by Mrouse Warren Smith
• 2006/10/03 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections raphfrk
• 2006/10/02 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Ka-Ping Yee
• 2006/10/02 [EM] 3Ballot -- Condorcet version #2 mrouse1
• 2006/10/02 [EM] 3ballot / rouse idea Warren Smith
• 2006/10/02 [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/10/02 [EM] ThreeBallot - Condorcet version mrouse1
• 2006/10/02 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/02 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections mrouse1
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Jan Kok
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] Giving different voting weights to different people Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Ka-Ping Yee
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Brian Olson
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections mrouse1
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections raphfrk
• 2006/10/01 Re: [EM] Giving different voting weights to different people raphfrk
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 27, Issue 15 Warren Smith
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] Giving different voting weights to different people Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/30 [EM] Giving different voting weights to different people raphfrk
• 2006/09/30 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Ka-Ping Yee
• 2006/09/29 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Brian Olson
• 2006/09/29 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections mrouse1
• 2006/09/29 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections raphfrk
• 2006/09/29 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Brian Olson
• 2006/09/29 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Brian Olson
• 2006/09/29 [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Warren Smith
• 2006/09/26 [EM] Discussion about web-based Range Voting polling systems Jan Kok
• 2006/09/25 [EM] zohopolls, web poll tech Brian Olson
• 2006/09/25 Re: [EM] Establishing an offline foundation for secure online voting raphfrk
• 2006/09/24 [EM] 2008 US Pres Range Voting poll - try it, and help spread the word! Jan Kok
• 2006/09/24 [EM] Establishing an offline foundation for secure online voting Bryan Alexander Ford
• 2006/09/21 [EM] Proxy voting questions mrouse1
• 2006/09/18 Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? raphfrk
• 2006/09/15 Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/15 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/15 [EM] puzzle Warren Smith
• 2006/09/15 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting Dave Ketchum
• 2006/09/15 Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? Scott Ritchie
• 2006/09/15 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting Scott Ritchie
• 2006/09/10 [EM] RE : Voting geometry, with interactive examples mrouse1
• 2006/09/09 Re: [EM] Consensus decision-making in wikipedia Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/09 [EM] RE : Voting geometry, with interactive examples mrouse1
• 2006/09/09 [EM] RE : Voting geometry, with interactive examples Kevin Venzke
• 2006/09/09 [EM] Voting geometry, with interactive examples mrouse1
• 2006/09/09 [EM] Consensus decision-making in wikipedia Gervase Lam
• 2006/09/04 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/04 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting RLSuter
• 2006/09/03 Re: [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting raphfrk
• 2006/09/02 [EM] A horrible thing we need to crush: Fusion Voting Brian Olson
• 2006/09/02 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy raphfrk
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? Brian Olson
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Stephen Turner
• 2006/09/01 [EM] Convex districts: a simple mathematical solution to gerrymandering? Steve Barney
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/09/01 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy raphfrk
• 2006/08/31 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/31 [EM] Ohio to Delay Destruction of Presidential Ballots RLSuter
• 2006/08/31 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls RLSuter
• 2006/08/30 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/30 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/30 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy raphfrk
• 2006/08/29 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Michael Poole
• 2006/08/29 Re: [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/29 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls RLSuter
• 2006/08/29 Re: [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Rob Lanphier
• 2006/08/29 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Rob Lanphier
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Michael Poole
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls RLSuter
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Michael Poole
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Rob LeGrand
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Chris Benham
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Chris Benham
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls RLSuter
• 2006/08/28 [EM] "two and a half" candidates - a way of looking at voting method development Warren Smith
• 2006/08/28 [EM] DH3 - error by me - should prefer BTR-IRV to Schulze beatpaths? Warren Smith
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Warren Smith
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Warren Smith
• 2006/08/28 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Chris Benham
• 2006/08/27 [EM] democratic community, the web, implicit/explicit instant proxy Brian Olson
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Chris Benham
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes RLSuter
• 2006/08/27 [EM] DH3 pathology, answers to my questioners Warren Smith
• 2006/08/27 [EM] DH3 pathology Warren Smith
• 2006/08/27 [EM] Keep It Simple Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/27 [EM] DH3 pathology Warren Smith
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Michael Poole
• 2006/08/27 [EM] advocacy by means of exit polls Stephen Turner
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Allen Smith
• 2006/08/27 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes RLSuter
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 26, Issue 14 Warren Smith
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Warren Smith
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Warren Smith
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes mrouse1
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Jan Kok
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Chris Benham
• 2006/08/26 Re: [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Allen Smith
• 2006/08/26 [EM] Rob Lanphier's hierarchical scheme Warren Smith
• 2006/08/26 [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Warren Smith
• 2006/08/25 [EM] DH3 pathology, margins, and winning votes Warren Smith
• 2006/08/24 Re: [EM] Proportional hierarchy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/23 Re: [EM] Proportional hierarchy Rob Lanphier
• 2006/08/23 Re: [EM] Proportional hierarchy Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/23 [EM] Proportional hierarchy Rob Lanphier
• 2006/08/23 [EM] Qui Tam lawsuit against voting machine manufacturers Stephen Turner
• 2006/08/22 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/21 Re: [EM] recommendations for news group with good polling facilities? Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/21 [EM] ZERO! Clean Hands Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/21 Re: [EM] recommendations for news group with good polling facilities? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/21 [EM] recommendations for news group with good polling facilities? Jan Kok
• 2006/08/20 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/08/20 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/20 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Paul Kislanko
• 2006/08/20 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/20 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/08/17 [EM] RE : Re: simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Kevin Venzke
• 2006/08/16 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/16 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial David Cary
• 2006/08/16 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/15 [EM] RE : Re: simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Kevin Venzke
• 2006/08/15 Re: [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/15 [EM] simpler proof of "no conflict theorem" now trivial Warren Smith
• 2006/08/14 [EM] Proportional Approval Method raphfrk
• 2006/08/10 [EM] Irish report Warren Smith
• 2006/08/07 [EM] "We Don't Need No Stinkin' Recount" Dave Ketchum
• 2006/08/07 Re: [EM] City of Davis, California considers Measure L: Using multimember STV for localelections James Gilmour
• 2006/08/04 [EM] Forwarded from Steven Hill, his WA Post oped: "Will Your Vote Count in 2006?" Chris Benham
• 2006/08/04 [EM] Report of the Irish "Commission on Electronic Voting" Chris Benham
• 2006/08/03 Re: [EM] Reading rangevoting.org/VotMach.html paper ballots Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/08/02 Re: [EM] Reading rangevoting.org/VotMach.html paper ballots Anthony Duff
• 2006/08/02 [EM] Forest Simmons endorses Range Voting Warren Smith
• 2006/08/02 Re: [EM] Reading rangevoting.org/VotMach.html Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/07/30 [EM] Reading rangevoting.org/VotMach.html Dave Ketchum
• 2006/07/29 Re: [EM] Please read Range Voting article on YourHub Jan Kok
• 2006/07/29 Re: [EM] Please read Range Voting article on YourHub Dave Ketchum
• 2006/07/28 Re: [EM] Competitive Districting Rule (back on topic) James Gilmour
• 2006/07/28 [EM] proposed weird change to the Australian state of New South Wales electoral law Chris Benham
• 2006/07/28 Re: [EM] Competitive Districting Rule (back on topic) raphfrk
• 2006/07/28 [EM] Please read Range Voting article on YourHub Jan Kok

• Earlier messages
• Later messages