election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2006/11/13 [EM] STV/Asset Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/13 Re: [EM] Range Voting strategy Juho
• 2006/11/13 [EM] Range Voting strategy Warren Smith
• 2006/11/13 Re: [EM] Range Voting strategy Juho
• 2006/11/13 Re: [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings James Gilmour
• 2006/11/13 [EM] Range Voting strategy Warren Smith
• 2006/11/13 [EM] Another method on approval ballots (approval-limited minimum opposition) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/13 Re: [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings James Gilmour
• 2006/11/13 Re: [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings raphfrk
• 2006/11/12 Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Jobst Heitzig
• 2006/11/12 [EM] STV when applied to choosing pizza toppings Nathan Larson
• 2006/11/12 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy Juho
• 2006/11/12 Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Juho
• 2006/11/12 [EM] RE : Re: Range Voting Strategy Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/11 Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Juho
• 2006/11/11 [EM] RE : Re: Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/10 Re: [EM] Range voting zero-info strategy simulation Simmons, Forest
• 2006/11/10 [EM] Majority Is When? Dave Ketchum
• 2006/11/10 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Paul Kislanko
• 2006/11/10 Re: [EM] Range Voting Strategy Chris Benham
• 2006/11/10 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/09 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/09 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• 2006/11/09 [EM] Condordet Criterion & Method Dave Ketchum
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions David Cary
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA David Cary
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Chris Benham
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/08 Re: [EM] IRV... David Cary
• 2006/11/08 [EM] IRV... Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/11/07 [EM] Range Voting Strategy Warren Smith
• 2006/11/07 [EM] IRV theorem Warren Smith
• 2006/11/07 [EM] Range voting fails IIA? Warren Smith
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Range voting fails IIA Chris Benham
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/07 [EM] Range voting fails IIA David Cary
• 2006/11/07 [EM] Thompson insurance like voting for a legislature raphfrk
• 2006/11/07 [EM] "punchscan" competition for three-ballot Brian Olson
• 2006/11/07 [EM] Electoral college competition rule raphfrk
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• 2006/11/07 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Chris Benham
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule mrouse1
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Brian Olson
• 2006/11/06 [EM] Oh my God, they patented Nanson's method mrouse1
• 2006/11/06 [EM] RE : Re: RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule mrouse1
• 2006/11/06 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
• 2006/11/06 [EM] Even simplier anti-gerrymandering rule raphfrk
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits mrouse1
• 2006/11/05 [EM] Old U.S. Adversary Poised for Comeback - washingtonpost.com Allen Smith
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
• 2006/11/05 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/04 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/03 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/03 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
• 2006/11/03 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/03 [EM] using single seat elections as a first stage for a PR election raphfrk
• 2006/11/03 [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits raphfrk
• 2006/11/03 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Chris Benham
• 2006/11/02 Re: [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/02 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
• 2006/11/02 [EM] RE : Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/02 [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/02 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Michael Poole
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation David Cary
• 2006/11/01 [EM] Majority Criterion, hidden contradictions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Dave Ketchum
• 2006/11/01 [EM] RE : Ranked Preference benefits Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/01 [EM] Ranked Preference benefits Juho
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/11/01 [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/01 [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) raphfrk
• 2006/11/01 [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (raphfrk) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation raphfrk
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, Range Dave Ketchum
• 2006/11/01 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range (Juho) Juho
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory David Cary
• 2006/10/31 [EM] RE : Re: Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, Range Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation raphfrk
• 2006/10/31 [EM] IFNOP method (continued) mrouse1
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
• 2006/10/31 [EM] RE : Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Warren) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/31 [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range (Juho) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/31 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation (Dave) Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/30 [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Warren Smith
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Juho
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
• 2006/10/30 [EM] Range voting, zero-info strategy simulation Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/30 [EM] RE : Re: RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/30 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
• 2006/10/29 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/29 [EM] RE : Re: Ranked Preferences, Range Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/29 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
• 2006/10/29 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Markus Schulze
• 2006/10/28 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/28 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Jonathan Lundell
• 2006/10/27 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Chris Benham
• 2006/10/27 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Candidate Strengths and Significance of Defeats Juho
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Juho
• 2006/10/26 [EM] Ranked Preferences, example calculations Juho
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/26 [EM] Candidate Strengths and Significance of Defeats Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/26 [EM] RE : Re: Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Kevin Venzke
• 2006/10/26 Re: [EM] EM: "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy" RLSuter
• 2006/10/25 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/25 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections David Cary
• 2006/10/25 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
• 2006/10/25 [EM] EM: "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy" for only $2.99 on Amazon.com, forwarded from Steven Hill Chris Benham
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Juho
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Chris Benham
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] ranked preferences Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Chris Benham
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory David Cary
• 2006/10/24 Re: [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/23 [EM] Addendum to condorcet method theory Antonio Oneala
• 2006/10/23 Re: [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
• 2006/10/23 [EM] Ranked Preferences Juho
• 2006/10/23 Re: [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Juho
• 2006/10/23 [EM] Majority Criterion poor standard for elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/23 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
• 2006/10/23 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
• 2006/10/23 Re: [EM] Disproportionate or proportionate representation system BABA NAM KEVALAM
• 2006/10/21 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
• 2006/10/21 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) mrouse1
• 2006/10/20 Re: [EM] vote pact Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• 2006/10/20 Re: [EM] vote pact raphfrk
• 2006/10/19 [EM] defense versus offense Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/19 [EM] vote pact Simmons, Forest
• 2006/10/19 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Juho
• 2006/10/19 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/19 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
• 2006/10/18 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/18 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) raphfrk
• 2006/10/17 [EM] No One To Vote For? Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/17 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Juho
• 2006/10/17 Re: [EM] 3ballot - revolutionary new protocol for secure secret ballot elections Juho
• 2006/10/17 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) James Gilmour
• 2006/10/17 Re: [EM] IFNOP Method (was Re: Question about Condorcet methods) Dave Ketchum
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] STV and STV-PR Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany Stephane Rouillon
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] Unicameral single-member + PR in Germany (Re: CompetitiveDistricting Rule) Juho
• 2006/10/16 Re: [EM] STV and STV-PR James Gilmour

• Earlier messages
• Later messages