election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electoral College (was Re: Voting by selecting a published ordering) Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering David Cary
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Simmons, Forest
• [EM] proxies and confidentiality (six variations) James Green-Armytage
  • [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Voting by selecting a published ordering Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality (six variations) Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Forwarded from Steven Hill, re. his new book "10 Steps to Repair American Democracy". Chris Benham
• [EM] IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Antonio Oneala
  • Re: [EM] IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Kevin Venzke
  • [EM] Ree: IRV done right... satisfies Strong FBC? Antonio Oneala
• [EM] What algorithms are there to find the Smith/Schwartz set? Gervase Lam
• Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet RaphFrk
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Gervase Lam
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Straight Approval or PAV? Gervase Lam
• [EM] Vermont Lawmakers may order study of statewide instant runoff voting Jan Kok
  • [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] Electing a proportional executive/cabinet Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] On IRV compressability Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] On IRV compressability Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] On IRV compressability Jonathan Lundell
• [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result radio deli
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
• [EM] Fwd: Greenspan Predicts 2008 (Perot Type) Independent Presidential Candidate Jan Kok
• [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result bql
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Anthony Duff
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Anthony Duff
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Brian Olson
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Dgamble997
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] Real IRV Election, Disputable Result Jonathan Lundell
  • [EM] Condorcet & Burying Eric Gorr
• Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] line item veto Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] [RangeVoting] line item veto Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] average over time proportionality election method raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method raphfrk
  • Re: [EM] average over time proportionality election method Jobst Heitzig
• [EM] consumable votes for a legislature raphfrk
• [EM] Invitation to a new discussion Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Invitation to a new discussion Simmons, Forest
• Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality RLSuter
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Raphael Ryan
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] real-world consequences of election methods Jonathan Lundell
• Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" - a "Vote for me" request. Jeff Wegerson
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" - a "Vote for me" request. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxies and confidentiality Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] DP in a legislature Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] DP in a legislature Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jan Kok
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Preface Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - What is FA for? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Should FAs be inclusive? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Special Purpose FAs Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - "Unfocused" FAs? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - Political Party FAs? Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - BeyondPolitics.org Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Free Association / Delegable Proxy FAQ - DP and proxy questions Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jiri Räsänen
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Jiri Räsänen
  • Re: [EM] proxy representation with "dissenting votes" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] an example of how FA/DP democracy could solve a major problem: spam Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] three papers Jeffrey O'Neill
  • Re: [EM] three papers Jeffrey O'Neill
• [EM] Papers on Schulze Method Markus Schulze
• [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jiri Räsänen
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jiri Räsänen
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Markus Schulze
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Tallying visualization for Condorcet methods? James Green-Armytage
• Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dharmadeva
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dharmadeva
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Anthony Duff
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 19, Issue 4 Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Abstaining from voting PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
  • Re: [EM] Abstaining from voting James Gilmour
  • [EM] Abstaining from voting Dharmadeva
  • Re: [EM] Abstaining from voting Abd ulRahman Lomax
• [EM] Bucklin PR ? Chris Benham
• [EM] Wiki featuring Voting Systems today. Anthony Duff
• [EM] Uncontested elections PROUT - Progressive Utilisation
  • Re: [EM] Uncontested elections Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Uncontested elections Dave Ketchum
• Re: [EM] Correlation methods (was Correlated Instant Borda Runoff) Simmons, Forest
• [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium Jan Kok

• Earlier messages
• Later messages