election-methods  

Messages by Thread

• • [EM] Group strategy (was Re: Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium) Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Approval Voting elections don't always have an equilibrium Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Abd ulRahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Ken Kuhlman
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Correlated Instant Borda Runoff, without Borda Paul Kislanko
• Re: [EM] plurality isn't so bad Dave Ketchum
• [EM] Updated article rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Updated article Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Updated article rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Updated article Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] Updated article rob brown
• Re: [EM] [instantrunoff] Eugene, OR: 'Top Two' ballot method would restrict choice Dave Ketchum
  • [EM] plurality isn't so bad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Re: [EM] plurality isn't so bad rob brown
  • Re: [EM] plurality isn't so bad Bob Richard
  • Re: [EM] [instantrunoff] plurality isn't so bad Jeremy Friesner
• [EM] interpolated median rob brown
• [EM] some questions about utility Stephen Turner
  • Re: [EM] some questions about utility Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] some questions about utility James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] some questions about utility Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Linear Spread Median Range Voting Yves Dandurand
• [EM] Benham's pairwise margins FBC method Warren Smith
• [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?) Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?) Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] [ER] FBC-complying Margins-like method (?) Chris Benham
• [EM] Strategy free method proposal rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Strategy free method proposal rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Strategy free method proposal Simmons, Forest
  • Re: [EM] Strategy free method proposal rob brown
• [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed - correction Warren Smith
  • [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed - correction Warren Smith
• [EM] #ballots with both truncation and equalities allowed Warren Smith
• [EM] counting ballots Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] counting ballots Paul Kislanko
• [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Jobst Heitzig
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates rob brown
  • Re: [EM] number of possible ranked ballots given N candidates Paul Kislanko
• [EM] history of random component in government Stephen Turner
  • Re: [EM] history of random component in government Scott Ritchie
• Re: [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver Dgamble997
  • Re: [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] two "new" hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver Dgamble997
• [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] Two approval ballot methods using approval opposition Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Two approval ballot methods... (small error) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Approval and cycles rob brown
• [EM] Brams-Sanver Warren Smith
• [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown rob brown
  • Re: [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown rob brown
  • Re: [EM] range voting fix try #2 by Rob Brown Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. Rob LeGrand
  • Re: [EM] Alright, next try. Range voting fix, version 2. rob brown
• [EM] two new hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] two new hybrid approval-ranking methods by Brams & Sanver Kevin Venzke
• [EM] 10% as much as possible... :) Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] 10% as much as possible... :) rob brown
• [EM] oops Warren Smith
• [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Rob Brown's "repair" of range voting rob brown
• [EM] yet MORE massive confusion by Venzke: Warren Smith
• [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] reply to Venzke's confusion (small correction) Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Fixing Range Voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Fixing Range Voting Eric Gorr
  • Re: [EM] Fixing Range Voting Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Fixing Range Voting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] Fixing Range Voting Scott Ritchie
• [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval? Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval? Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Advantage of MDDA over Approval? Anthony Duff
• [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV Scott Ritchie
  • Re: [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] Voting puzzle page now available at CRV Eric Gorr
• [EM] range voting - strength of feeling Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] range voting - strength of feeling James Gilmour
• [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections - without need of a computer! Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections pt 2 Kevin Venzke
• [EM] [email protected] Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] More results about computer simulations of elections Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] More results about... correction Kevin Venzke
• [EM] reply to venzke re utility, approval, range Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] reply to venzke re utility, approval, range Kevin Venzke
• [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix rob brown
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix rob brown
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix rob brown
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Dan Bishop
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix rob brown
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix rob brown
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Chris Benham
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] question re: converting ballots into a matrix Paul Kislanko
• [EM] Upgrading wiki.electorama.com Rob Lanphier
  • Re: [EM] Upgrading wiki.electorama.com Rob Lanphier
• [EM] Fwd: Re: Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour cbenhamau
  • [EM] Fwd: Re: Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour cbenhamau
• Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7 Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7 James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] election-methods Digest, Vol 18, Issue 7 Kevin Venzke
• [EM] Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] Why Utility is more important - reply to Venzke, Gilmour Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] Why Utility is more important than "transvestite Inversion Property" - reply to Venzke, Gilmour James Gilmour
• [EM] range voting mind-bogglingly stupid? (Reply to Rob Brown re voter strategy) Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] range voting mind-bogglingly stupid? (Reply to Rob Brown re voter strategy) rob brown
• [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Warren Smith
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting rob brown
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Kevin Venzke
  • Re: [EM] reply to Gilmour attack on range voting & social utility; CCd to RangeVoting Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
• [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Jan Kok
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Steve Eppley
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Paul Kislanko
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" James Gilmour
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" rob brown
  • Re: [EM] ignoring "strength of opinion" James Gilmour

• Earlier messages
• Later messages