election-methods  

Messages by Date

• 2012/02/22 Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 101 David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/22 Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/22 Re: [EM] MJ, Bucklin reply Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/22 [EM] MJ, Bucklin reply MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/22 [EM] Campaign contribution reform David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Brief MJ comment. ITC & conditional methods. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Campaign contribution reform robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/21 [EM] Typo MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/21 [EM] Brief MJ comment. ITC & conditional methods. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/21 [EM] CFR and Electoral Reform David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Kevin V. and Rich F. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/21 [EM] Campaign contribution reform Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/21 Re: [EM] Kevin V, Richard F., Raph F Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/20 Re: [EM] Kevin V, Richard F., Raph F David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/20 Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/20 Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Markus Schulze
• 2012/02/20 [EM] 'lection de trois David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/20 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Raph Frank
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Kevin V. Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] élection de trois élection de trois robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/19 [EM] élection de trois élection de trois David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Kevin V. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Kevin V. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 89 David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/19 [EM] Re Rich Fobes, Kristofer M, James G David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/19 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and Richard Fobes. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and James Gilmour. Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] (Kevin Venzke) and James Gilmour. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/18 [EM] Jameson: reply regarding SODA & favorite-burial MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/18 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Richard Fobes
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] JQ wrt SODA David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Markus Schulze
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? James Gilmour
• 2012/02/17 Re: [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 [EM] SODA arguments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/17 [EM] STV vs Party-list PR, could context matter? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/16 Re: [EM] Real-world examples of chicken dilemma? Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/16 Re: [EM] Something that can happen in SODA Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/16 Re: [EM] Something that can happen in SODA Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/16 [EM] Something that can happen in SODA MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/16 [EM] Jameson: Conditional methods and DH3 MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/16 [EM] Question about Schulze beatpath method Ross Hyman
• 2012/02/15 [EM] Real-world examples of chicken dilemma? Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/15 Re: [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/15 [EM] Conditionality-by-top-count probably violates FBC MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/14 [EM] Seeking co-author for paper on SODA, chicken dilemma, and Mturk experiments Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/14 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/14 Re: [EM] i don't get why mixed member rules use FPTP??? Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/13 [EM] i don't get why mixed member rules use FPTP??? David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/13 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/13 Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/13 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/12 [EM] NYT voting reform dialogue published today. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/10 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/10 Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Ted Stern
• 2012/02/10 Re: [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/10 [EM] My Bucklin multiwinner method turned more sequential Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/10 [EM] Jameson: I thought you said that people can safely rate sincerely in MJ. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/10 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. James Gilmour
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 [EM] Further comments to Kristofer's MJ posting MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/09 [EM] Poll on favorite voting methods Andrew Myers
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/09 Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/08 [EM] Re, take 2: NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/08 [EM] NYT/Richie voting reform "debate" next Sunday; write in. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] Election-Methods Digest, Vol 92, Issue 55 David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] Kevin V Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/08 [EM] MJ, Kristofer MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/08 Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/08 [EM] Utilitarianism and Perfectionism. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Bryan Mills
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/07 [EM] FW: Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] Kevin V David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/07 [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/07 [EM] Kristofer: MJ & RV MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/07 [EM] Jameson MJ. Alternative IC rule? ICT's main problem. MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/07 [EM] <ref> tags on electowiki? Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/07 Re: [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. Raph Frank
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 [EM] Re Raph Frank wrt 3-seat LR Hare and RV for US Senators by proxy. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
• 2012/02/06 [EM] "Semi-honest criterion"? Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. Raph Frank
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) Raph Frank
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 [EM] FYI: Wikipedia table of criteria compliances Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/06 [EM] Range Voting for State Representative election of US Senators. David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV (Raph Frank) David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
• 2012/02/06 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] STV+AV Raph Frank
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] [CES #4433] Looking at Condorcet - Recounting Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] [CES #4435] Looking at Condorcet - Runoffs Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/05 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kevin Venzke
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] STV+AV David L Wetzell
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] STV+AV Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] STV+AV Bryan Mills
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/04 [EM] Jameson: Repeating my statements MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/04 [EM] Universality of top-count-conditionality. MTAOC alone. Stepwise-When-Necessary. Conditional in Condorcet? MIKE OSSIPOFF
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Juho Laatu
• 2012/02/04 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Kristofer Munsterhjelm
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet robert bristow-johnson
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Andy Jennings
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] [CES #4429] Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] [CES #4445] Re: Looking at Condorcet Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Jameson Quinn
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] [CES #4437] Re: Looking at Condorcet Dave Ketchum
• 2012/02/03 Re: [EM] Majority-Judgement. Condorcet. Ted Stern

• Earlier messages
• Later messages