@john, you would be better off using the (debian) RPI4 image on
the downloads page as it has linuxcnc preinstalled.
Focus on building your machine, not building a bootable linux from scratch.

Rod Webster
*1300 896 832*
+61 435 765 611
Vehicle Modifications Network
www.vehiclemods.net.au


On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 11:40, John Figie <zephyr9...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alec,
>
> I am planning to control a machine with the RPI 4 but have not started
> putting things together yet. So I might be interested in Gentoo with
> Preempt -RT but Isn't there a Debian with Linux CNC already available?
> Is there a significant advantage of Gentoo? Would the realtime performance
> be better? I don't normally look at the forum unless I get a notification
> on specific topics that I subscribed to so I never saw your post.
>
> Regards,
> John Figie
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 6:45 PM gene heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:
>
> > On 1/7/25 17:19, Steffen Möller via Emc-developers wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >> Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Januar 2025 um 10:43
> > >> Von: "gene heskett" <ghesk...@shentel.net>
> > >> An: emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > >> Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] Gentoo+LinuxCNC image update
> > > ....
> > >>> Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
> > >> I am for it, with my toothpick sized oar, debian came around and
> wanted
> > >> to add linuxcnc to the deb system. They have since filed more bugs
> > >> against it, trying to make it fit their idea of how it should work I
> > >> guess, but I don't see it as a plus for us.
> > > ...
> > >
> > > I agree that the upload to Debian (which has indeed happened, see
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linuxcnc)
> > > had no immediate affect on the capabilities of LinuxCNC.
> >
> > but we are getting threats of removal about monthly, over stuff that has
> > no effect on us users. We have been doing the docs with our tools for
> > decades, and now a new doc processing system and tooling is being
> > dictated. The main .pdf document has been expanded around 300 pages
> > since wheezy but is still not up to your stds. As a long time user
> > (pushing 25 years) it seems like harassment. Granted, it is in the
> > longer view, an improvement in docs only but not to LinuxCNC's
> > functionality.  We would rather be making hot swarf.
> >
> > My $0.02.
> >
> > > But somehow the number installations reported on popularity-contest is
> > increasing
> > > (see https://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=linuxcnc-uspace)
> > ever since.
> > > And with every installation comes some extra eyeballs that may improve
> > something somewhere.
> > >
> > > Whenever someone sticks with the LinuxCNC community, it does not matter
> > how they learned
> > > about the project. And newcomers will find it easiest to address some
> > annoyance at the periphery (documentation, typos, tests, ...)
> > > as a start. This is also where I think LinuxCNC has improved a lot over
> > the past years - both wrt to infrastructure and content.
> > >
> > > Some 40 years ago the term "Computer Integrated Manufactoring" (
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-integrated_manufacturing)
> > > came up. This is where I see the role of a distribution: Make stuff
> work
> > with each other. To me, Debian is not about improving
> > > LinuxCNC itself. But people will look at it with very different
> > perspectives. Some are mere technical like "security"
> > > or "incompatibilities with library updates". Others ask why it is so
> > difficult to execute LinuxCNC from within FreeCAD.
> > > And maybe something then happens - preferably it is just something
> > missing in the documentation.
> > >
> > > Parts of the tests on a software to interoperate correctly in a
> > distribution are automated.
> > > There are certain paths that e.g. an icon for a desktop is supposed to
> > be using, so that other tools can find that
> > > icon. Something executable should have a manual page with the same
> name,
> > so the "man" application help spit out some help.
> > > The reports of such tests are published on
> > https://udd.debian.org/lintian/?packages=linuxcnc .
> > > And a user that does not know about our GitHub repository can send bug
> > reports to Debian's bug tracking system at
> > >
> >
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=linuxcnc-uspace
> > .
> > >
> > > I think that LinuxCNC wins once it is obvious to everyone that the time
> > invested is returned. And that LinuxCNC is
> > > secure and stable enough not to damage the hardware or the person using
> > it. With every typo (in the code or the documentation)
> > > we likely lose a decision maker (be it a home shop or a developer of
> > some larger machine manufacturer)
> > > to some closed source solution (that are hiding their typos :-) )
> > because of some felt insecurity.
> > > Therefore I cannot praise efforts like
> > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3253 or
> > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/pull/3233 enough that communicate
> > an "attention to detail and correctness".
> > > And that communication is important to have not only for the outsiders
> > to make a good first impression.
> > > It is also a perpetual reminder for ourselves.
> > >
> > > Happy New Year everyone
> > > Steffen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-developers mailing list
> > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> > > .
> >
> > Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
> > --
> > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> >   soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
> > -Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
> > If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
> >   - Louis D. Brandeis
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-developers mailing list
> > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>

_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to