http://www.ieee-pses.org/symposium
          http://www.emc2004.org/


Since the product has a telecom application and the RTTED
removed the lower voltage limitation in the LVD, and since
EN60825-2 is in the harmonized standards list for the
RTTED...


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
[email protected]

> From: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:34 AM
>
> Richard:
> I apologize if you felt that your previous answer
> was not what I wanted to hear, this is most
> certainly not the case. Granted, I can see that
> EN 60 825-2 would apply here. However, I'm used
> to invoking EN 60 825-2 from EN 60 950 as part of
> my defence for declaration to the LVD. But since
> I'm not testing to EN 60 950 for this passive
> product, I don't believe I can declare
> conformance to the LVD (or the R&TTE Directive).
>
> So what directive do I claim conformance to by
> testing to EN 60 825-2?
>
> I sincerely appreciate your and everyone's input.
> This board is great! I just feel I'm stuck and I
> can't get out of this hole without a push from
> you, you know what I mean?
>



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.

IEEE PSES Main Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions for use of the list server:

    http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to